Var debate 2019/20

For the fans in the stadium, could the referee, like they do in American football inform the crowd over the speakers? I can’t see why he couldn’t do this, yesterday Dean could’ve just said penalty been retaken due to encroachment, simple message everyone knows. Sterling shoulder offside goal disallowed.
And there you have it: "like they do in American football". What better words could have been written to show why this shite should be nowhere near a football match?
 
whether it is mm or the thickness of the lines, where the elbow starts etc etc, it's the new thing to debate but.... It WILL stop this sort of thing in future

james-milner-e1549312766704.jpg
 
VAR won't be perfect but it will be much more "perfectier" than when there's no var. We can talk about emotions and stuff but to question if it will be more fair, it's nonsense.
well that all depends who's on the VAR panel, can you honestly say and hold your hands up that 3 guys locked in a room are completely free of any influence and if you can prove it, i cant and wouldnt trust that 3rd party to make the correct decision, yes we have had bent refs but even a single bent ref can only do so much until it comes to light what he's up to, nothing has been wrong with the single ref system for over 100 years, yes we get bad decisions but the common phrase 'it evens itself out' and it did, all they have done is take a single human decision out and given it to 3 people tucked away in a room, whoever is responsible for introducing this mess needs educating..just my take
 
I’m generally against VAR, but if it’s going to be used then the offside rule needs to be amended. The simplest change would probably be to say that any part of either the attacker’s feet being beyond the defender constitutes an offside position. The respective angles of player’s bodies shouldn’t come into it.
 
Not sure that anyone has mentioned the subjective choice of frame used by the VAR team. I was watching one of the football shows and they showed the Raz offside frame by frame, and then the Mahrez pass to Raz for the lobbed goal. It really depends upon which frame they choose for when the ball left the foot of Merlin and Mahrez. It's arguable that Raz was onside for the first but offside for the second. As I said it depends on which frame they choose to freeze.
This is why I think the answer is to allow a “margin for error” - pretty sure they could work out approximately how far a player moves on average between frames, then for example give a 3 inches allowance on the VAR decision for benefit of doubt to attacker. They then move the line on the freeze frame by that distance when reviewing.

Job done.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.