The intent was not to persuade, rather it was to inform. To let the inexperienced know that a few of us have experience with this, and it will be okay. :) The game will go on.
There are advantages and disadvantages with most things. As much as we liked better TV coverage, slow motion replays and endless live football, it exposed the faults that referees and officials make they are human. It also exposed cheats and corruption. Referees have probably got better over the years but the mistakes and the clamour to criticise has got worse, all egged on by the media feed . Technology was necessary to assist the referees but it needs to be used properly and consistently. It should not replace the pitch official's authority/decision and they cannot refer all decisions to the guy in the back room, that is my fear from it's introduction as it will introduce delay and remove all spontaneity from the most exciting part of our game. The one thing i would like to see introduced is the 'miking' up of the referees. It will stop the verbal abuse they receive from players and we may get to understand the reason for their decisions. ( sponsors will see to it that players, managers, etc behave themselves ) There will still be enough passion in the game.
We'll see how it all settles down over the next few weeks hopefully it will bed down . For me what goes on in America can stay in America . Just my opinon, speaking as a fan for the last 50 years
Enjoyably :)