Var debate 2019/20

No drop in fan base
No drop in viewing figures
No drop in anything.

It’s usual social media outcry when there’s a change in a system, people won’t like it at first, will be a big hoo rah every now and then but in a couple years fans will adjust and it won’t be debated and moaned about.

Let’s not forget, before VAR , practically every match was overshadowed by referring performances and debated about endlessly.
Whereas every match is now overshadowed by a VAR abomination. Exaserbated by faceless, anonymous invigilators having time to look at incidents and stiil not applying real time logic or common sense. Far more sinister and open to corruption and/or personal bias.
 
Last edited:
.........., at the next stoppage the television match official asked the ref to look again, he had no problem doing so and reserved his decision.

The premier league and it's officials could learn a lot from the way rugby manage it's version of var.

Nail on head. You could be on to something here.

I think it's a farce they way it is being used now. Before it's introduction I was in favour of VAR and now I'm thinking it should be sacked off.

You make some good points about how it can be improved....
 
Whereas every match is now overshafowed by a VAR abomination. Exaserbated by faceless, anonymous invigilators having time to look at incidents and stiil not applying real time logic or common sense. Far more sinister and open to corruption and/or personal bias.

Well tonight’s match at West Ham.
VAR was called into action once and got the correct outcome, yet this is deemed as ‘controversy’
 
No drop in fan base
No drop in viewing figures
No drop in anything.

It’s usual social media outcry when there’s a change in a system, people won’t like it at first, will be a big hoo rah every now and then but in a couple years fans will adjust and it won’t be debated and moaned about.

Let’s not forget, before VAR , practically every match was overshadowed by referring performances and debated about endlessly.


No drop in fan base: Not had chance to have an any affect yet
No drop in viewing figures: As per above
No drop in anything: How about integrity

This VAR is a farce the vast majority of match going fans think this is the case

Before VAR only those decisions that the ref got wrong were debated now endless debates about VAR and the way it’s being applied Calling out players for being mm offside or the ball glancing an arm is a fucking farce and to sit there and wait whilst some clown plays with his technology toy, which isn’t even accurate, is an absolute joke
 
No drop in fan base: Not had chance to have an any affect yet
No drop in viewing figures: As per above
No drop in anything: How about integrity

This VAR is a farce the vast majority of match going fans think this is the case

Before VAR only those decisions that the ref got wrong were debated now endless debates about VAR and the way it’s being applied Calling out players for being mm offside or the ball glancing an arm is a fucking farce and to sit there and wait whilst some clown plays with his technology toy, which isn’t even accurate, is an absolute joke

The way I understood VAR when it was first introduced and was being trialled is that part of its purpose was to keep consistency with the decisions made and to intervene and correct clear and obvious errors. As we have seen thus so far it's not doing its job.
When alls said and done the all singing all dancing, fancy Dan technology had been checked the final decision is still made by human who can give the wrong call.
 
Yep, exactly that. It worked on World Cup as they did check any potential situation. But then everybody moaned about VAR slowing the game down and we have this shit now where they don't have any responsibility and don't give a fuck. Even if they make mistake, they can always put it down to the VAR.
Plus the fact that lpool and the rags don't have a big screen to show a replay and both clubs voted against VAR ...mmmm
 
Nail on head. You could be on to something here.

I think it's a farce they way it is being used now. Before it's introduction I was in favour of VAR and now I'm thinking it should be sacked off.

You make some good points about how it can be improved....

Most of us were.

The thing was, most fans/footballers/managers etc had a vision of the eradication of dogshit decisions. We all thought that a ref misses a pen, VAR overturns it. Ref gives a dodgy pen, VAR overturns it. Nobody told us that VAR was only there for backing a ref on every wrong decision they make. If we knew this beforehand, there wouldn’t have been an outcry for VAR in the first place.

How can we be in a situation, where a system has been implemented to assist referees, because they get things wrong and then nothing gets overturned? Are we now saying that referees have become infallible with the introduction of this technology?

In its current format, VAR is a complete waste of time. We keep hearing that refs don’t want to overturn subjective decisions.....so what is the fucking point, it’s the subjective decisions that they clearly get wrong on the field, that drives us all mad.

Either change it from its current format, preferably by removing refs from the process and making the VAR officials independent, or bin it and use it for offsides only. I can’t carry on watching turd decisions being given the thumbs up by VAR. I’d rather just go back to slagging off incompetent on-field refs.
 
Most of us were.

The thing was, most fans/footballers/managers etc had a vision of the eradication of dogshit decisions. We all thought that a ref misses a pen, VAR overturns it. Ref gives a dodgy pen, VAR overturns it. Nobody told us that VAR was only there for backing a ref on every wrong decision they make. If we knew this beforehand, there wouldn’t have been an outcry for VAR in the first place.

How can we be in a situation, where a system has been implemented to assist referees, because they get things wrong and then nothing gets overturned? Are we now saying that referees have become infallible with the introduction of this technology?

In its current format, VAR is a complete waste of time. We keep hearing that refs don’t want to overturn subjective decisions.....so what is the fucking point, it’s the subjective decisions that they clearly get wrong on the field, that drives us all mad.

Either change it from its current format, preferably by removing refs from the process and making the VAR officials independent, or bin it and use it for offsides only. I can’t carry on watching turd decisions being given the thumbs up by VAR. I’d rather just go back to slagging off incompetent on-field refs.
If VAR is looking at clear and obvious on penalty decisions then you have to question decisions like today for lpool and the two we should have had......as you say whats the point if they wont overturn the refs decision on penalties ? what I think should happen is the ref is made to look at it on the screens provided in the tunnel otherwise whats the point of the screens being there?
 
If VAR is looking at clear and obvious on penalty decisions then you have to question decisions like today for lpool and the two we should have had......as you say whats the point if they wont overturn the refs decision on penalties ? what I think should happen is the ref is made to look at it on the screens provided in the tunnel otherwise whats the point of the screens being there?

If the on-field ref had not given the pen today, the VAR ref wouldn’t have overturned the decision. Not because it was or wasn’t a pen but because the referees, have somehow managed to get the powers that be, to sign-off on them not overturning any decisions. It’s a farcical situation to be in.

If they won’t overturn anything, the only suggestion I can think of, is that the on-field ref, gives a ‘soft signal’ decision in real-time, like they do in cricket. He then goes and checks the monitor at the side of the pitch and he either sticks with his original decision or overturns if he feels he has made a mistake. The VAR ref can then be solely used for offsides.
 
The whole problem is that 'clear and obvious' actually has no real meaning, it's just a nonsense smokescreen to cover incompetence. Imagine explaining VAR to someone who doesn't watch the sport; 'It's a system which allows wrong decisions to happen if they're not considered too wrong by someone who holds zero culpability to the viewers for the review'; it's genuinely the most absurd thing that has happened to the sport.
 
I'd like to see Monday Night Football call this faux VAR out and compare it to other coutries use of it. Bring the stats and show how many times VAR has overruled a refs original decision or he himself has changed his mind vs the clear & obvious BS the FA/EPL is serving up. We all know Sky won't have the balls to dig them out especially with the dippers out in front.
 
I'd like to see Monday Night Football call this faux VAR out and compare it to other coutries use of it. Bring the stats and show how many times VAR has overruled a refs original decision or he himself has changed his mind vs the clear & obvious BS the FA/EPL is serving up. We all know Sky won't have the balls to dig them out especially with the dippers out in front.
The only time Ive seen VAR overturn an officials decision is rags and arselona and today for palaces goal..if they can do that why not on penalty decisions ?
 
Refs won’t give decisions to City & have the safety net of VAR, if it’s clear & obvious it will be over turned but they never are.

Refs give decisions to Dippers & if it’s a clear & obvious mistake VAR will over turn but they never do.

Once again the crooks win, but we’ll still win the title, they just delay the obvious.
 
If VAR is looking at clear and obvious on penalty decisions then you have to question decisions like today for lpool and the two we should have had......as you say whats the point if they wont overturn the refs decision on penalties ? what I think should happen is the ref is made to look at it on the screens provided in the tunnel otherwise whats the point of the screens being there?
They've just set the bar ridiculously high. I honestly can't think of a single refereeing decision that's been overturned by VAR when it comes to penalties. In that sense, the decision to not overturn the Mane decision was consistent with all of the other decisions this year. But it'll be interesting at the end of the year to see how many times a VAR check goes for or against each team, because that will give you a good indication in the bias of referees. To be fair, Liverpool have had one go against them this year too, when they could have had a penalty at Newcastle but the referee didn't give it and neither did VAR. Having said that, it's easier when a dodgy decision goes against you earlier in a game, rather than in the last kick of the game.
 
VAR shouldn't be used for matters that are open to interpretation.

If the ref calls the foul on a player for example and the decision on whether to award a free kick or penalty depending on where the foul occurred I have no problem with VAR.

Off sides like Palace's second goal again no problem if its not possible to overrule definitively then the refs original decision should stand.

Penalties where a player infringement occurs be it goal keeper or player movement again no problems and the list goes on.

With penalties like the one awarded to Liverpool yesterday I don't believe VAR should be used in an effort to confirm or overturn based on " clear and obvious error " again whatever that means.

I think the bulk of the neutrals would say it was a blatant dive based on minimal contact but the ref decided on a penalty and that's it as far as I am concerned.

Leicester stuffed up in the lead up to the penalty notwithstanding that is no reason why a dive from no contact or little contact should be awarded the fact remains some are but in the end they can only blame themselves for allowing themselves to be in a position where Albrighton decided to connect with the back of Mane's leg.

Those that think Liverpool are a good team given the favours they get from refs , the quality of the opposition they face in the premier league at present haven't watched a lot of football over the years.

There only half decent test to date was Napoli away and we saw the result.

Leicester gave them a game they just came up short at Anfield and while Liverpool may end up winning the title this year , their side pales into insignificance to the sides of the 70's and 80's relatively speaking.

They have been massive under achievers for over 30 years now so I have little concern if they have their 15 minutes in the sun and break our 18 game winning streak etc etc.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top