Var debate 2019/20

It may seem like sour grapes but I'm struggling with the whole VAR thing.

In the Schalke game, the VAR monitor wasn't available to the on pitch referee.

He had awarded a corner only to be
verbally instructed through his earpiece, to change his decision to a penalty due to the VAR ref's opinion that Otamendi had handballed and should also be booked.

UEFA confirmed that although there was no facility for the on pitch ref to check on a monitor, he was told to change his mind, 'to ensure the correct decision was reached '.

UEFA want the correct decision, fair enough, we all want that.

So it's down to the TV cameras.

Do VAR use their own or the TV companies camera's?

Surely there is only one crew of cameramen working a game. Maybe someone can confirm this?

Do the TV companies, if it's their camera equipment, decide what to show UEFA?

If so, Can UEFA come out and make a statement to explain why that referee wasn't shown every TV angle available?

I'm presuming Llorente's goal was reviewed due to the VAR guy spotting a handball, that we've now all seen, with the ball striking Llorente's arm, before going into the net.

So, why wasn't that ref verbally instructed to award the correct decision like at Schalke.
Or worse, Why wasn't he shown the angle everyone else saw?

Maybe I'm just very disappointed, but it doesn't sit right with me.
 
FCBarca said:
Finest margins. Shame really, clearly off the elbow on one particular angle which I believe they had but the Turk seemed to fixated on the other two angles where it was not visible. I thought similar about the VAR review on the Juventus claims of Blind handling the ball late in their match - no different than the one that saw United go through over PSG yet VAR says it wasn't. Definitely VAR helps make the game more just but equally there are aspects to improve
Click to expand...
In cricket, when they use video evidence, you can hear the officials and if they are undecided they often ask "are there any other angles?". They're under less time pressure in cricket, though. Hopefully they'll learn from this and that question is asked in future, but as I think it's obvious that the conclusive angle was withheld, I'm not holding my breath. The VAR team need to be visible too and heard if it is to command the fans' respect. I thought the ref was pretty good last night, but now we have to consider the bias of the VAR team. Are they chosen with as much care as the on-field officials?
 
Pablo ZZZ Peroni said:
AS’s resident referee Iturralde González commented: ”It hits his hand first then his hip and the UEFA instructions are clear: you can't score if it hits your hand, even if it’s involuntary. It doesn't matter if the elbow is tight to the body. If it happens to a defender it's not a penalty, but if it's an attacker it has to be disallowed. Rossetti has told the UEFA referees.”

He added: "Irrati (the VAR) - the number one VAR official - advises Çakir because he's seen a hand. When Çakir comes back from seeing the images he tells the players 'I didn't see anything. It hit his thigh.' They didn't play him the view from behind where you can see it hits the elbow. The error from the VAR is not showing the two key images. Why? The question is getting it right, not how long it takes."

AS’s resident ref's conclusion: "Manchester City are out because the VAR wasn't used properly".
Click to expand...

Like a good majority have been saying all along. Fucking hate getting robbed. We got fucked over good and proper last night. Even thinking about only showing one angle to the ref makes my blood boil. Bastards cost us the quadruple.
 
ctid1894 said:
Fucking coward, you’re avoiding the original question of why Llorente didn’t get his arm out of the way of a relatively slow moving ball from 20-25 yards away.
Click to expand...
I take it you`ve never played the game otherwise you`d realise that its impossible to even think about your stupid claim in a micro second.It hit his hip but dont let Citys shit defending get in the way of excuses,thats what lost us the match.
I`ll glady meet and you can call me a coward to my face you key board warrior.
 
So from next season onwards it will hard to spontaneously cheer a goal. What's the fucking point anymore. My lad rang me up late last night and told me he's fucking his season card off for next season(he's 35 and been going since he was 5). Emotions running high I know but to me it feels like the game I know and love is fucked. I hate VAR with a passion and not just because of last night.
 
Pablo ZZZ Peroni said:
AS’s resident referee Iturralde González commented: ”It hits his hand first then his hip and the UEFA instructions are clear: you can't score if it hits your hand, even if it’s involuntary. It doesn't matter if the elbow is tight to the body. If it happens to a defender it's not a penalty, but if it's an attacker it has to be disallowed. Rossetti has told the UEFA referees.”

He added: "Irrati (the VAR) - the number one VAR official - advises Çakir because he's seen a hand. When Çakir comes back from seeing the images he tells the players 'I didn't see anything. It hit his thigh.' They didn't play him the view from behind where you can see it hits the elbow. The error from the VAR is not showing the two key images. Why? The question is getting it right, not how long it takes."

AS’s resident ref's conclusion: "Manchester City are out because the VAR wasn't used properly".
Click to expand...

Well this seems pretty conclusive.
 
Pablo ZZZ Peroni said:
AS’s resident referee Iturralde González commented: ”It hits his hand first then his hip and the UEFA instructions are clear: you can't score if it hits your hand, even if it’s involuntary. It doesn't matter if the elbow is tight to the body. If it happens to a defender it's not a penalty, but if it's an attacker it has to be disallowed. Rossetti has told the UEFA referees.”

He added: "Irrati (the VAR) - the number one VAR official - advises Çakir because he's seen a hand. When Çakir comes back from seeing the images he tells the players 'I didn't see anything. It hit his thigh.' They didn't play him the view from behind where you can see it hits the elbow. The error from the VAR is not showing the two key images. Why? The question is getting it right, not how long it takes."

AS’s resident ref's conclusion: "Manchester City are out because the VAR wasn't used properly".
Click to expand...


where did you get this statement from ?
 
They'll sweep all the bad VAR decisions under the carpet and just put them down to teething problems. VAR is going to stop fans celebrating goals instantly, instead they're going to wait for the decision to come through from a caravan ten miles away.
 
oakiecokie said:
I take it you`ve never played the game otherwise you`d realise that its impossible to even think about your stupid claim in a micro second.It hit his hip but dont let Citys shit defending get in the way of excuses,thats what lost us the match.
I`ll glady meet and you can call me a coward to my face you key board warrior.
Click to expand...

Shit defending or not, it hit his elbow first. You can’t score with an illegal part of the body, intentional or not.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.