SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 89,078
I’ve already said, Salah’s was nothing to do with var. that’s entirely down to the ref on the pitch and it was a penalty. But var didn’t give it. The ref did.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Var debate 2019/20
- Thread starter Chi-town blues
- Start date
brummie blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 9,310
Other than offsides (which a computer decides) VAR isn't solving anything when a ref/official makes the decision, as with the penalty we didn't get against Spurs, and the penalty we didn't get today, the decision makers are either incompetent or biased. On both occasions, numerous people including former officials and players, media, pundits and fans of all teams thought they should have been penalties.
The only decisions we can trust are offsides and goal line technology, because there is no one making the decision, the technology does it.
The only decisions we can trust are offsides and goal line technology, because there is no one making the decision, the technology does it.
M
M
manchester blue
Guest
2. It's ruining football
3. It's killing the game
4. Season ticket for sale.
Other than offsides (which a computer decides) VAR isn't solving anything when a ref/official makes the decision, as with the penalty we didn't get against Spurs, and the penalty we didn't get today, the decision makers are either incompetent or biased. On both occasions, numerous people including former officials and players, media, pundits and fans of all teams thought they should have been penalties.
The only decisions we can trust are offsides and goal line technology, because there is no one making the decision, the technology does it.
Offside bit, not accurate that. FPS to slow to keep up with the speed players are running.
@BluePhil8
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 13,425
Issue is Ric is that we get poleaxed in the box all the time and get about 1 in 10 awarded as pens. That's not even hyperbole.Do you not think it was a fucking ridiculous decision by Luiz to grab Salah’s shirt like that?
Yes the shirt tug was a pen, but why can't the refs looking right at Rodri getting rugby tackled or Silva being stamped on call those piss easy decisions? It's by design.
SebastianBlue
President, International Julian Alvarez Fan Club
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 57,736
And a human still sets where the forward most playable extremity stops in the (sometimes arbitrarily) defined key frame of the replay video for all offside assessments.Offside bit, not accurate that. FPS to slow to keep up with the speed players are running.
M
M
manchester blue
Guest
Other than offsides (which a computer decides) VAR isn't solving anything when a ref/official makes the decision, as with the penalty we didn't get against Spurs, and the penalty we didn't get today, the decision makers are either incompetent or biased. On both occasions, numerous people including former officials and players, media, pundits and fans of all teams thought they should have been penalties.
The only decisions we can trust are offsides and goal line technology, because there is no one making the decision, the technology does it.
No it doesn't. A human moves the frames until he thinks the ball is played. At 50 frames a second he can easily manipulate it so that the attacker appears offside in tight decisions. A computer most definitely does not make the decision.
kaz7
Well-Known Member
Luiz is ridiculous on a stick but why was that given as penalty and rodders not? the var refs and the onfield ref sticking together is not helping,parts of the system are already redundant if the var refs won't overturn the onfield refs,if they are intent on carrying on with it they have to explain what this higher threshold is,Walton doesn't know but defended the system anyway yesterday,they need to tell the public and the pundits what it means then maybe we might understand better and give them a break,it's too late for us that they have been outed as not having the right equipement to judge such a tight offside,that has goneDo you not think it was a fucking ridiculous decision by Luiz to grab Salah’s shirt like that?
blue moony
Well-Known Member
It’s plainly obvious they are using it to make the referees look better ! They will just agree with the Ref unless it’s something so ridiculous that they can’t!
It is being run by the refs for the benefit of making the refs look better , which isn’t hard as they are shite !
The VAR team should be an independent team , possibly not even of referees!
Watching the Tottenham game today the fourth official if it was him in green was a fat overweight bastard , call them self’s professionals , it’s a disgrace they can’t get into decent shape! Sums them up in one picture , a total mess
It is being run by the refs for the benefit of making the refs look better , which isn’t hard as they are shite !
The VAR team should be an independent team , possibly not even of referees!
Watching the Tottenham game today the fourth official if it was him in green was a fat overweight bastard , call them self’s professionals , it’s a disgrace they can’t get into decent shape! Sums them up in one picture , a total mess
brummie blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 9,310
Offside bit, not accurate that. FPS to slow to keep up with the speed players are running.
While I agree FPS needs improving as does giving VAR officials every camera angle (which it seems they do not get) my point is the decision makers are guided by technology, not by their own incompetence or bias.
Bear in mind that every premier league club was demo'd the technology and the FPS and agreed to use it. Unfortunately the clubs didn't agree to which idiots get to make the decisions