gingerprince
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Oct 2007
- Messages
- 1,146
Sons red card rescinded
VAR is fine as a system. It's the idiots operating the system that are the problem. No consistency, no transparency and no idea. They also appear to have changed the way it is working which means different games have been played under different laws i.e. we surely would have been given at least three penalties in the league this season. And what has happened to the fact they said the ref on the field makes the ultimate decision as this has been quite obviously a lie since day one. It's a corrupt system helping certain teams and people line their pockets, of that I have no doubt.
I may have misinterpreted, but I don't think that's true. The two incidents are separate things.
If a defensive handball is enough to be a penalty, it would (should) be brought back whatever the result of the play is. VAR would (should) be reviewing off the defensive handball, not the outcome.
VAR is going to produce a full-scale riot soon.
Chelsea v Ajax. Second red. Exact same situation as Ota at Schalke. Similar to pen at PSG too. They see making the body bigger as a yellow card offence. You only get that impression when you watch everything in slow mo away from the ground.
That 2nd red at Chelsea v Ajax must rank as one of the worst decisions in football I have seen. Criminal that refereeing totally changes a game.
I would suggest something simpler. The only remit of the VAR panel should be to bring something to the attention of the ref and "suggest" he might want to go and look at the pitch side replay.The whole process needs to be simplified.
The on-field official makes 100% of decisions. They should be allowed to view any incident they are unsure of leading to a goal, penalty or red card on the big screens when the game comes to a natural stop (e.g. free kick, goal kick, throw in) or when there’s a lull in play (e.g. no immediate attack or counter attack). Any incident missed by the referee should be brought to the officials attention by the VAR official at those stops or lulls in play.
Communication should be completely transparent between officials (on-field and VAR), players and fans during those decision making processes and all incidents shown on the big screens.
e.g.
Referee “please can we review the potential David Silva penalty incident? I think he may have been fouled but couldn’t be certain from my angle”
VAR replay incident on big screen for the referee to make his/her final decision, on-field official to request different angles.
e.g. 2
VAR official “please can you review the David Silva penalty incident?”
VAR replay incident on big screen for the referee to make his/her final decision, on-field official to request different angles.
If a decision can’t be made in 1 minute of being shown on the big screen, play is resumed with the original decision standing.
I know exactly how you feelThey need to ditch the fucking farce I want to celebrate goals like I did before The only thing that makes me believe it’s a goal is when the opposition kicks off
Ref must have got a indication from VAR on his ear-pieceAnd presumably, I haven't seen the game, all that was done with the assistance of VAR? Did the ref run over and consult the telly on the side?
As for a riot, there must be even among the gentle souls in CBL3 someone who might have waited for Mason to fall asleep on the 1900 from Victoria to Bolton and given him a good slap!