VAR Discussion Thread | 2024/25

BlueHammer85 said:
Simply rest my case.

how can anyone not be for VAR after years and years of this sort of stuff.
Click to expand...
Put it to the vote. You’d accept that wouldn’t you? All season ticket holders at every club from Prem to 4th div.
Do you want VAR? Yes. No.
What do you think outcome would be? Yes? No?
 
johnnytapia said:
Put it to the vote. You’d accept that wouldn’t you? All season ticket holders at every club from Prem to 4th div.
Do you want VAR? Yes. No.
What do you think outcome would be? Yes? No?
Click to expand...

There’s various polling around and it’s hard to get a overall picture


The key one for me here says that over half fans would keep VAR if it was quicker and less involved - I think you can agree this season that has happened, with most decisions left to the onfield referee and VAR decisions taken more quickly.

Also worth noting , 19 out of 20 clubs voted in favour of keeping VAR, Including Man City. Why do 95% of clubs wish to keep it when it is corrupt and only favours Man Utd and Liverpool ?
 
BlueHammer85 said:
Someone else replied saying Man Utd got these corrupt penalties on a weekly basis pre VAR. Do you disagree ?
Click to expand...

If someone posts the Rashford/Fernandes goal in 30 years, does that mean VAR is shit. Someone posts the Liverpool/Spurs offside incident, VAR is incompetent? It's not the gotcha you think it is.

And now you are just doing your thing again where you pick up on what a few fans say then throw it back at other fans who say the opposite. Neither set of fans are right or wrong because it is a subjective recollection from what happened 30 years ago. My recollection is that United got a lot of dubious penalties and it was difficult to get one against them. Not unlike today, actually.

None of this is the gotcha you think it is, nor the validation of VAR you think it is.
 
BlueHammer85 said:
There’s various polling around and it’s hard to get a overall picture


The key one for me here says that over half fans would keep VAR if it was quicker and less involved - I think you can agree this season that has happened, with most decisions left to the onfield referee and VAR decisions taken more quickly.

Also worth noting , 19 out of 20 clubs voted in favour of keeping VAR, Including Man City. Why do 95% of clubs wish to keep it when it is corrupt and only favours Man Utd and Liverpool ?
Click to expand...

Two points.

First, every fan would be happy with VAR if it was quicker, less involved and better communicated in the ground so it doesn't affect the fan experience. Some progress has been made with being less involved this year by using referee's judgement unless "clear and obvious" which is a good thing. Why wasn't it less involved before? That's history I suppose, but I can't complain about that. It's still not fast enough, but I suppose that, if pushed, I could accept getting something right is better than getting it wrong quickly. But on the fan experience, it's still an absolute shambles. Take the Stones goal as an example. A last minute winner, the most emotional of experiences for a fan, and no-one in the ground (or for that matter watching on tv) knew what was going on, who was checking or overturning what. It's hopeless. Even after the fact, no-one knew what the linesman had done with his flag and why, what the referee did and what VAR was doing. It. Is. Hopeless.

Second, why did 19 clubs vote to keep it? Seriously? Why did 18 clubs vote for APT rules when they were warned they could be unlawful and when even the PL's own legal advice was less than convincing? Why are the clubs looking at introducing anchoring rules when they have been warned they are unlawful? Why did the clubs refuse to close the "Chelsea" PSR loophole. The PL and its governance is a mess and the fact 19 clubs voted to continue with VAR means nothing other than 19 clubs saw some benefit in going with PGMOL advice, or at least some benefit in not going against it. Just don't tell me the driving force is the good of the game.

Edit: they also need to drop this fallacy that offsides are factual. They will never be factual because whatever technology is used (human eye, retroactive line drawing, SAOT) there will always be margins of error. They just need to decide what margin is acceptable and run with it. I would suggest using the same method as for "subjective" calls. Go with the on-field call unless it is clearly wrong.
 
Last edited:
On Wednesday, just after half time we scored. The ref pointed to the spot whilst the City players jumped all over Ake.
I turned to look at the screen, the ones in the ground not the one in my front room, to see the replay of the goal. Nothing came up.
That should have given me a clue but as everyone was running back for the restart I carried on looking.
Then the ref took the ball and gave it their keeper ! He then made him go further back into the box to take a free kick.
I quickly worked out it wasn't going to be given (I'm not the brightest spark :-)
Only after he'd launched it did the screens show a Var check was under way and only after a lengthy gap were we told the goal had been disallowed.
At no time were we told why it was disallowed.
Until Var can communicate with fans in real time it can fuck right off.
I'm sure those watching on TNT knew immediately and were even shown replays but hey fuck the match going fan.
 
johnnytapia said:
Put it to the vote. You’d accept that wouldn’t you? All season ticket holders at every club from Prem to 4th div.
Do you want VAR? Yes. No.
What do you think outcome would be? Yes? No?
Click to expand...

Here's a interesting small pole.

Luton relegated and back in Championship, they've experienced a full season with VAR and now into this season without.

luton.vitalfootball.co.uk

Luton Town – Back To The Great VAR Debate

I always thought we were playing a game called football, but which variant is now my question?
luton.vitalfootball.co.uk luton.vitalfootball.co.uk

70% are now pro VAR.
 
BlueHammer85 said:
Here's a interesting small pole.

Luton relegated and back in Championship, they've experienced a full season with VAR and now into this season without.

luton.vitalfootball.co.uk

Luton Town – Back To The Great VAR Debate

I always thought we were playing a game called football, but which variant is now my question?
luton.vitalfootball.co.uk luton.vitalfootball.co.uk

70% are now pro VAR.
Click to expand...

70% of 32 people. Don't insult our intelligence.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.