VAR Discussion Thread | 2024/25

We need to get rid of VAR not add more to it like challenges, there is so much wrong with this idea Let the officials get on with their job like they did for over a hundred years VAR has made things worse and the offsides taking 4 minutes to decide is frankly madness when it is clear that using videos with some bullshit tech to allow for parallax is shear madness Then the use of VAR to determine if there has been a clear and obvious error by a ref yet intakes five minutes of slow motion repeat and free frame to decide is a total contradiction. There are so many anomalies as to how it is used as well eg VAR cannot help with a two yellow card situation that leads to a red yet it looks at reds
The inch high Lino on Sunday taking ages to put his flag up, not his fault working under instruction

But we are stuck with it because its more money for the officials and extends their life in the job

Are you not seeing how little VAR is involved this season ? Unless the ref has missed a clear and obvious then VAR will not intervene, but the vast majority of penalty decisions, red cards etc are left to the Refs discretion. Far better and exactly what fans have been calling for.
 
You seriously believe that Webb and the PiGMOL crewe would go for such a system ?

They are able to control events on the pitch exactly how they want to, despite VAR as it currently is, and I doubt that Howard will be allowed to relinquish that by the main cabal members .

They would lose that ability that is why it is better than VAR.
 
All a bit premature as it probably won't happen, but I really don't think it needs to be so complicated. Most challenges would be when a ball is dead. Fouls given, yellow cards, red cards, corners, throw-ins, goal-kicks, corners, penalties, off-sides given, handballs given. The few others can be handled off-field and quickly by VAR when the ball is in play.

And as for a spate of frivolous appeals in the last few minutes, there could only be a maximum of two. And players spend half injury time rolling around with fake head injuries anyway. There are other problems to worry about. Also, the very first time a manager wastes his challenges in the last few minutes and has none to use when the referee misses a clear penalty in the last seconds, will be the very last time it happens.

One of the biggest problems of VAR wasn't that they overthought it, it was that they underthought it. Anotherwords, your argument is I'm making it too complicated, and I would say to that, lets not make the same mistake we did with VAR and focus on "not making it too complicated". In this case we really need to meticulously craft the system to work without problems and in a way that will enhance the game without being too overbearing. We should be sure to close any possible loopholes which you also alluded to.

Remember when VAR was rolled out, it was all top down coming from FIFA itself. FIFA simply threw VAR on all the leagues, and remember for 1 or 2 years the PL resisted implementation of VAR when they could have. VAR was never something that came from grass roots England. It came straight from the FIFA headquarters and one of the big reasons why England has had so many problems with their version of VAR is due to this fact, that VAR was made "in a simple" way, without foresight to all the problems it would have.

So when you say "you're making it too complicated" that's when I worry that they'll take your advice and just throw a challenge system out there without enough details and they'll be naive to think it would work right.

Remember, I'm the guy who doesn't want VAR or a challenge system. And as I can see I'm not the only one. But I'm trying to be constructive here and give FIFA an "off-ramp" to their failed system VAR and help them implement a more sustainable system of selective review with a challenge system. So I'm not advocating for a challenge system, but if that's what FIFA's talking about, if that's what they're considering, then I would much rather have that than VAR if they do it right.
 
One of the biggest problems of VAR wasn't that they overthought it, it was that they underthought it. Anotherwords, your argument is I'm making it too complicated, and I would say to that, lets not make the same mistake we did with VAR and focus on "not making it too complicated". In this case we really need to meticulously craft the system to work without problems and in a way that will enhance the game without being too overbearing. We should be sure to close any possible loopholes which you also alluded to.

Remember when VAR was rolled out, it was all top down coming from FIFA itself. FIFA simply threw VAR on all the leagues, and remember for 1 or 2 years the PL resisted implementation of VAR when they could have. VAR was never something that came from grass roots England. It came straight from the FIFA headquarters and one of the big reasons why England has had so many problems with their version of VAR is due to this fact, that VAR was made "in a simple" way, without foresight to all the problems it would have.

So when you say "you're making it too complicated" that's when I worry that they'll take your advice and just throw a challenge system out there without enough details and they'll be naive to think it would work right.

Remember, I'm the guy who doesn't want VAR or a challenge system. And as I can see I'm not the only one. But I'm trying to be constructive here and give FIFA an "off-ramp" to their failed system VAR and help them implement a more sustainable system of selective review with a challenge system. So I'm not advocating for a challenge system, but if that's what FIFA's talking about, if that's what they're considering, then I would much rather have that than VAR if they do it right.

Fair enough.
 
Are you not seeing how little VAR is involved this season ? Unless the ref has missed a clear and obvious then VAR will not intervene, but the vast majority of penalty decisions, red cards etc are left to the Refs discretion. Far better and exactly what fans have been calling for.

Hard to argue with that, tbf. Just get rid of the 100% accurate offside nonsense and the two minute delays and it will be acceptable.
 
Just been watching the New Zealand v England cricket test match. There were quite a few video reviews during the game. The vocal descriptions of what was being checked was clear and concise, so everyone knew what was being reviewed - that should be a priority for implementation in football. But there are problems with that system as well. For example, ball tracking. There were two instances where the ball seemed to do follow the same track towards the stumps but when the decision was sent back to the on-field umpire he reached different conclusions - he took the wind as a factor - one decision was OUT the other NOT OUT.
 
Are you not seeing how little VAR is involved this season ? Unless the ref has missed a clear and obvious then VAR will not intervene, but the vast majority of penalty decisions, red cards etc are left to the Refs discretion. Far better and exactly what fans have been calling for.
Yes its better BUT the criteria for clear and obvious is inconsistent Also we still have the long debates on VAR 4 mins to decide if a player is offside when it is clear that it is impossible to determine for sure from the evidence The Forrest goal, suddenly they decide it was off after nearly 4 mins then the lines popped up on the screen and it wasn't evident why there was a gap
The handball decision on Monday that gave WHU a goal don't tell me that was the correct decision as much as I want a win for you guys due to the affect on City that was a ridiculous one as bad as the one against Grealish in the FAC Final

We are still getting the linos not flagging for a clear offside, play going on then suddenly flagging this is because of VAR Then we see the same Lino flag for what is a marginal decision

VAR wasn't needed it has spoilt the game
Offside was never there is penalize a toe nail off
We want to see goals they do their level best to disallow them
It can't intervene on second yellows which if we have to have it then it should a player being SO wrongly is just as bad as a wrong red card

Fans in the stadium are last to hear the decision even the ref hears after Tv
 
Are you not seeing how little VAR is involved this season ? Unless the ref has missed a clear and obvious then VAR will not intervene, but the vast majority of penalty decisions, red cards etc are left to the Refs discretion. Far better and exactly what fans have been calling for.
Referee's unfortunately have been conditioned into waiting for VAR and have become incapable of making difficult decisions in real time. So when VAR has take a 'step back' this season they don't what the fuck they're supposed to do.
 
Are you not seeing how little VAR is involved this season ? Unless the ref has missed a clear and obvious then VAR will not intervene, but the vast majority of penalty decisions, red cards etc are left to the Refs discretion. Far better and exactly what fans have been calling for.
Apart from telling the ref to give you lot a ridiculous penalty on Monday night
 
Are you not seeing how little VAR is involved this season ? Unless the ref has missed a clear and obvious then VAR will not intervene, but the vast majority of penalty decisions, red cards etc are left to the Refs discretion. Far better and exactly what fans have been calling for.

Yea it missed Haaland being rugby tackled all the time on Sunday
 
Apart from telling the ref to give you lot a ridiculous penalty on Monday night

Still the refs decision ultimately and he had a look at the monitor and deemed it a pen. Right or wrong decision all I want is officials to not be making blind decisions and given a second look
 
Wonder how they will manage that considering they struggled getting Lutons ground up to spec and had months

I don’t know the exact ins and outs but I don’t recall reading that making the ground compliant with VAR was a particularly huge issue. Just bringing it up to Premier League standards in general.
 
Still the refs decision ultimately and he had a look at the monitor and deemed it a pen. Right or wrong decision all I want is officials to not be making blind decisions and given a second look
But he got it right with the first look then made it wrong with the second look How was it a clear an obvious error in the first place in any case
Why only somethings get a second look surely you want it to be everything?
 
But he got it right with the first look then made it wrong with the second look How was it a clear an obvious error in the first place in any case
Why only somethings get a second look surely you want it to be everything?

But it was a handball, and his hand was in an unnatural position, whilst I can see it deemed harsh by some as it only slightly changed the trajectory of the ball and it was minimal contact, under the laws of the game that's a handball and a penalty.
 
But it was a handball, and his hand was in an unnatural position, whilst I can see it deemed harsh by some as it only slightly changed the trajectory of the ball and it was minimal contact, under the laws of the game that's a handball and a penalty.
Brentford player did not appear to deliberately touch the ball, did not have his body in a position that was “unnaturally big” and was also in close proximity to the cross. That, plus the deflection consideration, should mean there was no possibility of a penalty. But then the VAR got involved.
 
Brentford player did not appear to deliberately touch the ball, did not have his body in a position that was “unnaturally big” and was also in close proximity to the cross. That, plus the deflection consideration, should mean there was no possibility of a penalty. But then the VAR got involved.

Its still down to the Ref, he had a look and deemed it a pen, it can be argued either way but for me, whilst a bit harsh, it was a handball and his hand was high and it changed the trajectory of the cross.
VAR have every right to inform the Ref to have a second look. the outcome of the Refs decision is solely on him, not VAR.
 
We need to get rid of VAR not add more to it like challenges, there is so much wrong with this idea Let the officials get on with their job like they did for over a hundred years VAR has made things worse and the offsides taking 4 minutes to decide is frankly madness when it is clear that using videos with some bullshit tech to allow for parallax is shear madness Then the use of VAR to determine if there has been a clear and obvious error by a ref yet intakes five minutes of slow motion repeat and free frame to decide is a total contradiction. There are so many anomalies as to how it is used as well eg VAR cannot help with a two yellow card situation that leads to a red yet it looks at reds
The inch high Lino on Sunday taking ages to put his flag up, not his fault working under instruction

But we are stuck with it because its more money for the officials and extends their life in the job

Wait, so when a corrupt on-field official ignores something blatant, we should just "get on with the game" even when we, the fans, or TV picks up that blatant decision?

At least if the players are able to challenge that decision the ref would have to review it in front of the worldwide audience.

And it's not slow-mo or freeze frame that's, in itself, the issue(but it is in isolation), it's viewing in context that's not always presented and that should be consistent.

For me, the inconsistency of interpretation for the viewing of VAR is the issue.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top