The media attitude to VAR changed during the last international break. Before the break they were very vociferous, after the break they backed off as though someone's had a word.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
VAR impact and consequence log - game 27
- Thread starter flook
- Start date
-
- Tags
- consequence impact lost points var
Mad Eyed Screamer
Moderator
For the Mahrez one there were two checks.For the second incident Mahrez wasn't even offside, the lines shown he was on, no arms or fingernails or boot laces was off yet they give it. They thought he handballed it, he never. Digne looked like he fouled him. For the free kick to be given offside was abysmal .
Then we only had 2 minutes time added on.
Second half I didn't see any major incidents, no VAR checks I don't think, 4 minutes added on. From where?
Funny when the score is close it's more minutes. You just know if it was 3-0 it's 1 minute added on.
It all stinks, it's as plain as day, how these pricks at the FA and pigmol think nobody can see through the corruption baffles me.
Unless you're a Liverpool fan you don't celebrate a goal going in as you know it'll get the microscope treatment.
1st to see if he was onside or off. It proved he was onside.
So then it was looked at to see if the resulting challenge in the box was a penalty or not. It wasn't given.
I assume the ball went out of play after the challenge - so Everton were awarded a goal kick????
TheRemainsOfTheDave
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Mar 2017
- Messages
- 6,491
How does the first legit goal get scored if they are reviewing the foul and first goal (that will get chalked off), play won't have restarted? Or have I misunderstood?I was thinking about VAR when Jesus scored the first. Here's a scenario that could or probably has happened, almost, definitely maybe.
VAR reviews a foul in the box (a penalty decision is needed), play goes down the other end. A goal is scored. VAR must review the foul and the goal. It finds both are incorrect, but as it is doing so the team that had been fouled in the box scores a legit goal. Immediately from the restart the opposition score a goal, also legit. Fans go mad, the crowds go mad and all hell breaks loose. Even LiVApool fans think the game is bent that day.
In all seriousness VAR really heats people up. Seen some placid blokes go ape-sh!t bonkers this season...
No you're right mate, I came to the same conclusion but couldn't be bothered answering.How does the first legit goal get scored if they are reviewing the foul and first goal (that will get chalked off), play won't have restarted? Or have I misunderstood?
manimanc
Well-Known Member
No they give the free kick as offside, mariner had his hand up and gave the free kick as offside, play resumed with an Everton free kick where mahrez was 'offside'.For the Mahrez one there were two checks.
1st to see if he was onside or off. It proved he was onside.
So then it was looked at to see if the resulting challenge in the box was a penalty or not. It wasn't given.
I assume the ball went out of play after the challenge - so Everton were awarded a goal kick????
He was on by at least half a finger.
TheRemainsOfTheDave
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Mar 2017
- Messages
- 6,491
The "referee" signalled offside which is what I thought odd. Surely if the offside call was incorrect and the subsequent foul was not given then it should be a dropped ball or something. Signalling offside suggested the offside call was correct, which it wasn't. What a mess.For the Mahrez one there were two checks.
1st to see if he was onside or off. It proved he was onside.
So then it was looked at to see if the resulting challenge in the box was a penalty or not. It wasn't given.
I assume the ball went out of play after the challenge - so Everton were awarded a goal kick????
B
B
blueinsa
Guest
The media attitude to VAR changed during the last international break. Before the break they were very vociferous, after the break they backed off as though someone's had a word.
They all have to survive economically off the game so its in their interests to follow the same path.
B
B
blueinsa
Guest
What a mess.
Not really.
No goal for City, no penalty, Everton ball, job done.
Blumers Bloomers
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Jan 2008
- Messages
- 7,005
I tell you who must bloody love VAR ....Mr personality himself Dermot Gallagher! Must be making a mint, he’s everywhere
Mad Eyed Screamer
Moderator
Yes because if he was initially offside then there would be no need to review the penaltyThe "referee" signalled offside which is what I thought odd. Surely if the offside call was incorrect and the subsequent foul was not given then it should be a dropped ball or something. Signalling offside suggested the offside call was correct, which it wasn't. What a mess.