Exeter Blue I am here
Well-Known Member
Using it only on appeal is probably the best way to go but I'd only give them 1. That way they'd only use it if they were pretty sure of getting the right result. People like Sean Dyche wouldn't be able to abuse it and take their cheating to a level that doesn't exist at the moment. He would definitely have gone for it after the first goal and then City probably wouldn't have got the second after the delay to review it and finally award the goal. If coaches lost their only appeal by doing that type of thing, they might think better of it. You could even reward a correct appeal by giving them another to make 2.
It's a nice idea, but as the Juve/Torino derby fiasco recently showed, the system will still be at the mercy of the pig headed officials involved. In case you missed it, Juve scored, Torino objected because there had been a clear foul in the build up, the ref reviewed it on the VAR and, despite the aforementioned foul having been absolutely blatant, incredibly decided to uphold his original decision to give a goal. As we've also seen with the Lukaku 'kick in the cobblers' non-ban, the VAR will be a waste of time, because it will be open to ridiculous interpretation. Last minute at the Swamp, Aguero gets scythed down by De Gea in the box, and City play their appeal. Can you honestly see Madley, Taylor, Jones et al, awarding us a penalty on review? Not a chance