Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 57,599
Which is perfectly rational. I can see why you say that and will back your viewpoint up.There were two potential infringements in the build up to the goal. In my view, the first foul should not have led to the goal being disallowed, because Taylor said he wouldn't penalise this type of foul, and he refereed the game in that manner.
The second infringement was kicking the ball whilst Allison had it under control. This didn't fall within Taylor's edict of leniency.
I think the goal was disallowed for the foul though, which was a poor decision in my opinion.
I can also see why it was disallowed as both “fouls” were 50/50.
If VAR hadn’t been in operation, can we, in certainty, say that Taylor wouldn’t have refereed the game differently?