VAR thread 2022/23

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
SebastianBlue said:
I am sure if Haaland had run blindly, without checking to see where Pickford was, and cleaned out the dirty punter, he would have been awarded a penalty for maintaining a “natural run”.

By the way, the ball was 4 yards beyond Haaland when Pickford “appears to reach for the ball”.

It’s just farcical what they come up with to legitimise these bad (corrupt) decisions.

Webb’s new program did and will serve the same purpose: showcase the less contentious decisions, ignore the more controversial ones, and try to legitimise the inconsistent, nonsensical officiating, in an attempt to obfuscate continual attempts to manipulate match results.
Click to expand...
If Pickford reached for the ball from 4 yards away he would still be 3.75 yards short of it with his flappers,sorry , flippers
 
So Webb flaunting his way round the media showing one obvious handball is going to make us think VAR officials do a good job when we see shockers nearly every game is not going to change my mind that they are either not good enough or are bent
 
Interesting to see how they generate the lines for offside and it's how we thought in that they select the frame they want manually which given the speed of players and the speed of frames per second from the camera it is easy to manipulate. Go forward one frame, go back one frame etc.
 
SebastianBlue said:
I am sure if Haaland had run blindly, without checking to see where Pickford was, and cleaned out the dirty punter, he would have been awarded a penalty for maintaining a “natural run”.

By the way, the ball was 4 yards beyond Haaland when Pickford “appears to reach for the ball”.

It’s just farcical what they come up with to legitimise these bad (corrupt) decisions.

Webb’s new program did and will serve the same purpose: showcase the less contentious decisions, ignore the more controversial ones, and try to legitimise the inconsistent, nonsensical officiating, in an attempt to obfuscate continual attempts to manipulate match results.
Click to expand...
I remember a game at the Etihad v Wolves where Kevin Dillon was chasing a ball inside our area, closely followed by Joleon. The former stopped running and let Joleon clatter into him. Penalty!

Pickford has pushed Haarland to the ground. Penalty! Just another this season that refs were programmed not to give.
 
Eds said:
Interesting to see how they generate the lines for offside and it's how we thought in that they select the frame they want manually which given the speed of players and the speed of frames per second from the camera it is easy to manipulate. Go forward one frame, go back one frame etc.
Click to expand...
was always going to be that, the cameras they use are not good enough to get it spot on, which is fine but there needs to be a margin of error when drawing the lines to equate for this but there isn't.

the goal line tech is far superior but that still has a margin of error.
 
Eds said:
Interesting to see how they generate the lines for offside and it's how we thought in that they select the frame they want manually which given the speed of players and the speed of frames per second from the camera it is easy to manipulate. Go forward one frame, go back one frame etc.
Click to expand...
Absolutely spot on,they can get the desired outcome as you say forward or back,all this PR from the league and refs they just take us for mugs …
 
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader said:
I remember a game at the Etihad v Wolves where Kevin Dillon was chasing a ball inside our area, closely followed by Joleon. The former stopped running and let Joleon clatter into him. Penalty!

Pickford has pushed Haarland to the ground. Penalty! Just another this season that refs were programmed not to give.
Click to expand...
I just think of the penalty Arsenal got from Eddie going out to block a shot…
 
N1985 said:
It's not just the Rashford goal I want to hear it for, I'd throw Rodris handball against Everton last year into the hat as well.

Something ain't right.
Click to expand...
I have said previously that if you watch this incident again play started with an indirect free kick to City , 2 yards outside the box. My theory is that they were off side before it hit Rodri's arm. Can be only explanation as to why ref gave us an indirect free kick.
 
SebastianBlue said:
I just think of the penalty Arsenal got from Eddie going out to block a shot…
Click to expand...
Yeah, it doesn't matter how many times they modify the LotG and 'improve' the application of VAR it will still come down to the interaction between the ref on the field and the wallah in the VAR shed. I wonder just how VAR and the ref 'interacted' with the Pickford Haarland incident. Another game, another team, another ref and a different guy in the shed and yer can bet yer bottom dinar that the Rags or Dippers would be rewarded.
 
Stato said:
was always going to be that, the cameras they use are not good enough to get it spot on, which is fine but there needs to be a margin of error when drawing the lines to equate for this but there isn't.

the goal line tech is far superior but that still has a margin of error.
Click to expand...
They apply their 'margin of error' SUBJECTIVELY. It is NOT a level playing field.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top