Ergh ............ the cameras didn't work when we played them a couple of seasons back so I am not suprised they haven't got enough cameras to cover the goal.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
VAR thread 2022/23
- Thread starter Ric
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
blue moony
Well-Known Member
Ergh ............ the cameras didn't work when we played them a couple of seasons back so I am not suprised they haven't got enough cameras to cover the goal.
Should be banned from signing players till its sorted , same for rags
If you can pay millions for players you can install a big screen
If that mean you have to replace seats and have a lower attendance then thats your fault you scummy twats
Should have 10 point deduction if they start next season with out one
Keepingthefaithsince1976
Well-Known Member
How can the corner taker be offside when the ball came back to him sideways to cross it again? That salah goal not offside because the defender headed it straight from an offside pass? Weird.
svennis pennis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Apr 2008
- Messages
- 12,051
I believe to be promoted to the premier league you must have it installed. Yet Liverpool and United don’t need to…How can a Premier League / Champions League ground NOT have all relevant camera angles for VAR to work effectively?
It shouldn't be allowed, Surely?
Salford in the City
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Jul 2021
- Messages
- 352
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Some extremely dubious decisions in that Liverpool v Wolves game tonight.
It definitely seemed with that Wolves goal near the end that it was a very, very late flag!
And to say you've only got a limited camera angle available, well it just points to a very contrived decision.
Very hard done to tonight the men from the Midlands!
It definitely seemed with that Wolves goal near the end that it was a very, very late flag!
And to say you've only got a limited camera angle available, well it just points to a very contrived decision.
Very hard done to tonight the men from the Midlands!
We will have our resident spammer/wum along soon to tell us its a brilliant system and it was offside. We are all wrong and always are.So different rules literally do apply at certain grounds in the competition. Wow there simply is no way to defend a system as flawed as this
It would surely be embarrassing to defend VAR if it’s not the case that every premier league ground has the same VAR kit/spec/capabilities. I mean it’s actually scandalous if trueWe will have our resident spammer/wum along soon to tell us it’s a brilliant system and it was offside. We are all wrong and always are.
Crooked_rain
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2021
- Messages
- 5,834
- Team supported
- Man City
Shouldn’t but it’s VictimpoolHow can a Premier League / Champions League ground NOT have all relevant camera angles for VAR to work effectively?
It shouldn't be allowed, Surely?
So anything goes
Blackley_Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 Nov 2021
- Messages
- 1,725
- Team supported
- City
There's a video on twitter showing the head of the wolves player just about on the screen as the wolves player heads the ball back to him and from that video/angle, he's well onside...
There's also a video of the referee pointing at the linesman just after the ball goes in the net, "possibly" telling the linesman to put his flag up?
I put this in the match thread but I'll stick it in here too...
Dodgy
- Status
- Not open for further replies.