VAR thread 2022/23

[Colin Bells Boots]

But they didn't discuss it endlessly. If anyone has a recording, it would be interesting to hear how long it was form the incident to the "final decision" being made.

It wasn't that long before the rat faced **** was dancing around , so " endlessly " is an exaggeration imo

 

[Bluearmy]

It wasn't that long before the rat faced **** was dancing around , so " endlessly " is an exaggeration imo

15/20 seconds i reckon

 

[Hart of the Matter]

Eh, trippier boots his leg. Pen all day long!!

Agree about the commentator and the double touch, clueless

Watch again... He stands on Trippers foot before Trippers contact..

 

[Jessie]

Fulham player stamps on Trippier’s right shin/ foot before Trippier makes any contact. It wasn’t a penalty. You could argue on the Burn shirt pull but it wasn’t clear and obvious (I thought the player went down at the slightest touch).

We were given a free kick just outside the box when Longstaff dived, the ref must have realised and moved the free kick at least 8 yards back to try and stop us scoring.

The ref got a few wrong today and VAR somehow missed the foul on Trippier.

Oh, the non offside decision in your game was a complete joke and it seemed to me that the referee over ruled the linesman and VAR didn’t call a clear and obvious error. Think it was the ref who messed up there.

 

[Bluearmy]

Watch again... He stands on Trippers foot before Trippers contact..

He might accidentally stand on trippier’s right foot during the incident, that doest give trippier the right to clean him out with his left foot. Clear pen as both managers have agreed

 

[The Future’s Blue!]

He might accidentally stand on trippier’s right foot during the incident, that doest give trippier the right to clean him out with his left foot. Clear pen as both managers have agreed

Didn’t MotD show that Trippier actually stood on the defenders foot/ankle first and when it went to the screen, VAR didn’t show the ref the alternate angle meaning he didn’t get to see the original incident that set this off?

 

[Jessie]

The Fulham player tries a couple of step overs and then stands on Trippier’s foot which stops him getting to the ball with his right foot. It’s a foul.

For the Burn incident VAR would have intervened as the Fulham player handles the ball before the (very light) pull.

Without putting any bias on it just say what you see on the video.

 

[Oystercatcher28]

Every PL ground should show tge review on the screens. LiVARpool and ManUre should be made to fit screens. Bournemouth have it. Or projectors to projection screens. A stack of 1990 plasma screens. Anything but nothing.

 

[Oystercatcher28]

Maybe add a Captain's Challenge each game. For obvious and apparent errors, VAR must step in. If your challenge fails, then you lose the right to challenge for the next game.

 

[Stoned Rose]

Whatever the pros and cons of VAR, this certainty isn’t true. Ask anyone in the City end when Grealish scored yesterday.

There’s missing the point and there’s really missing the point.