Villa (H) Post Match Thread

Another cracker from the commentary team tonight was them trying to claim Aston Villa's 3 weeks without a game as a disadvantage. First it was that they would be rusty, and then in the second half they were questioning whether their lack of match fitness would mean they'd fade away. No mention at all of the fact we played 3 days ago.
 
The worst of it was Walton came back and spent about 90 seconds explaining in detail why he was initially wrong & why under the rules it was a perfectly good goal. Camel Gob then said that in his opinion it shouldn't have stood!

"I think it's a terrible decision".

It's one thing to disagree with the law, fair enough, but if you think it's the wrong decision after having it explained to you as if you're a toddler, you're too stupid to give your opinion on a game.
 
Just caught the highlights on sky sports you tube

Mings cock up(he is actually staring at Rodri when the ball is originally cleared so he knows he’s behind him somewhere, should have cleared it)

The second is a pretty straightforward penalty


Pundits are thick or biased in Owens and Ferdinands case they have both well covered.
 
Let’s it’s face it, the drugged up dromedary would be crying from the rooftops that all players should be aware of the offside rule, if the rags scored from the same position..
Utter **** ... Just like the rest of BT Sport, luckily I binned it so don’t have to put up with the spiteful cunts ...
 
Same with Rio Ferdinand. If he doesn't understand the rules of a sport how can he comment on it? He might as well commentate on ice skating or gymnastics.
He could present that couples programme ‘Cheaters’, or maybe a documentary on drugs in sport. Should know a bit about those.
 
Smith making a **** of himself with statements like that

"For the second goal, a header from a yard out that has hit his arm. That's not handball. Ridiculous.
Ridiculous or not the LotG say penalty. I wonder what this muppet would have said had it been up the other end.

And the cheat's cheat Walton is blathering offside for the first. But if Mings got robbed by Rodrigo, who appears to have come from an offside position, it's irrelevant 'cos Mings would be the opposition touch that renders anyone onside whether yer half a yard inside the Villa half or on the goal line five yards behind the keeper - last touched by an opposition player.
 
I noticed how much quieter McPointy went after we scored and how much less glee there was in the few comments he made until the end of the game. Utter biased bell-end of a pundit who claimed it couldn't be a penalty because Jesus' header was going wide !
Ha ha. He did say that. Thought I was hearing things.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.