I can assure you the match day thread wouldn't be fuming about the laws of the game if Mahrez, Sterling, Gundogan, Rodri, and whoever the latest villain of the week is, if they lost the ball like that!Why are blues still posting that they would be pissed off if that goal was given against us ?
Mings should have headed it clear simple. He didnt he looked round, saw Rodri there but still controlled it with his chest, he then took a second touch before Rodri tackled him.
It shows how stupid BT are, they employ an ex ref who doesnt know the rules. They also employ a drug cheat who hates City so much he still insists it was offside well just because, it is not fair Mister.
As for the second goal, they are given every week as penalties, people are only moaning because it was given for City.
Fuck 'em.
I disagree, Villa defended resolutely and took the game to us at times.never give credit to a team hell bent on parking the bus and hit you on the break
also wasting time and slowing the game down and villa got what they deserver fuck all
Targett looked more than decentTwo things on Villa. They battled like fuck for a result, fair play, and that left-back, Targett, wouldn’t look out of place in our team.
Mings and the defence were amazing all night except they’ve cocked that goal up big time. Why are there no shouts from his team mates? He could have let it go and not touched it, he could have just belted a header away and he could even have done half of what he did do, chest it and then boot it instead of turning back into Rodri. Forget about the laws it was a goal of Villa’s makingI hated his time at City as well
Well said mate.That twat hates us ! Him and snidy Tim Howard never miss an opportunity to have a dig at us.
Everybody who understands football knows that he was played onside by Mings touching the ball, nobody at BT or on the Villa bench understands this, frankly, I find that baffling.Ridiculous or not the LotG say penalty. I wonder what this muppet would have said had it been up the other end.
And the cheat's cheat Walton is blathering offside for the first. But if Mings got robbed by Rodrigo, who appears to have come from an offside position, it's irrelevant 'cos Mings would be the opposition touch that renders anyone onside whether yer half a yard inside the Villa half or on the goal line five yards behind the keeper - last touched by an opposition player.
I thought that was hillarious, his hatred of City showed live in the game, and I suspect someone has phoned him and pointed out that he was incorrect, and then ferdinand saying I bet not one player on the pitch knew the rules, I don't think many players know many of the rules, and the more obscure/convoluted they make them the worse it will get.The worst of it was Walton came back and spent about 90 seconds explaining in detail why he was initially wrong & why under the rules it was a perfectly good goal. Camel Gob then said that in his opinion it shouldn't have stood!
But it's working!Fuck me ragged, that was hard work. Great defending by Villa and no real No.9 from us.
fuck 'em indeed.Why are blues still posting that they would be pissed off if that goal was given against us ?
Mings should have headed it clear simple. He didnt he looked round, saw Rodri there but still controlled it with his chest, he then took a second touch before Rodri tackled him.
It shows how stupid BT are, they employ an ex ref who doesnt know the rules. They also employ a drug cheat who hates City so much he still insists it was offside well just because, it is not fair Mister.
As for the second goal, they are given every week as penalties, people are only moaning because it was given for City.
Fuck 'em.