Virgil van Dijk

[waspish]

£50m is ridiculous.

50m is the new 15m

 

[BLUEMATT23]

Give em 40 million and Santa Cruz

 

[lee_wsm]

People forget with more sky money transfers fees go up and up. There are less poor teams and more rich teams. You know have young players going for more than seasoned pros used to be.

 

[Kompany is King]

The question is, does he improve us?

 

[Cheadle_hulmeBlue]

50 m would be ridiculous. southampton would be laughing all the way to the bank.

 

[BlueMoonz1977]

He has the experience of the league and maybe that is what we should be looking for instead of another mangala. I think he would be a great purchase

 

[Goater=Legend]

I know people say the cost doesn't matter but its the fact we keep managing to spend +£30mil all the time.

Umtiti cost £20m. Van Dijk cost fuck all for Southampton, we was looking at spending over £40mil on Laporte.

Why are we always waiting for someone else to sign these players first?

 

[FantasyIreland]

I know people say the cost doesn't matter but its the fact we keep managing to spend +£30mil all the time.

Umtiti cost £20m. Van Dijk cost fuck all for Southampton, we was looking at spending over £40mil on Laporte.

Why are we always waiting for someone else to sign these players first?

13m,while relatively cheap,is hardly 'fuck all'.

He could also have flopped,given many supporters believed the better player of the two at Celtic was Denayer.

 

[NorCalBlue]

13m,while relatively cheap,is hardly 'fuck all'.

He could also have flopped,given many supporters believed the better player of the two at Celtic was Denayer.

The City brass could probably get Denayer from Sunderland for 40 million and save ourselves 10 million.

 

[blueyorkie]

13m,while relatively cheap,is hardly 'fuck all'.

He could also have flopped,given many supporters believed the better player of the two at Celtic was Denayer.

I asked a Celtic fan about Denayer, he told me that VVD was their top defender by a mile