Virgil van Dijk

Status
Not open for further replies.
For all those scousers who think he joined Liverpool because he rejected City and twice the pay etc etc blahfkin blah....

"Liverpool's desire to sign Van Dijk comes through the size of the fee, which Manchester City - who were also interested - were not prepared to match"
 
We have rarely used it because Kompany, Stones and Otamendi have not been fit together.
We have rarely used it because it steals a player from the midfield or forward line, which is where we do the business. Fernandinho plays the third CB when needed, as he slots in between the two CBs when the two FBs are playing in wide midfield roles.
 
Silly money but a good signing for them, be silly to claim otherwise. Perhaps proof Coutinho is off?

He's the CB I'd have wanted but fortunately it's a position with plenty of other options.
 
Well the dippers and rags are steeped in history, history for inflating the transfer market. £75mil for VVD unreal! And they’ll blame us for the rising cost of players.
 
Good player and one that I thought would excel under Pep. I was not at all opposed to us signing him but for that price I'm alright with us letting him go. Hopefully can get a younger and cheaper CB either in Jan or the summer
 
Decent signing for them. They address the goalkeeping problem & they have a fair side.

They might be serious title challengers next season with a decent goalie and VVD. Honestly i was never too big on VVD. We can do better. Plus otemendi and stones are a very much established cb now with kompany to support them. We do need a replacement for mangala but that can wait till summer when there will be a bigger pool of players to target.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.