sir baconface
Well-Known Member
Two things I'd add to the debate.
One: At the general level, football has changed mucho from when we were shit. Quite a lot is for the better. However, the game has sold part of its soul for silly money and naked commercialism. In such an environment, is it surprising if people are more "picky", more cynical of pumped-up idols and, in turn, less likely to give uncritical allegiance?
Two: Everything is relative. We're not on Stockport County resources, FFS. City have thrown sufficient money around to be judged against the most demanding standards. If and when we look to fall significantly short (and let's be honest, it has been known) why shouldn't people give voice?
We've practically reached the stage where no "elite" manager can be judged until he's purged the expensive squad he inherited and brought in his own favourites at vast additional expense. Those who manage on a shoestring are scorned as no-marks. Excuse me if some us with ordinary jobs and home lives don't feel particularly comfortable with those "values".
In summary, City operate in a rarefied and unreal world. They've brought us some fabulous players but don't own us. Many of us will continue to enjoy the good bits without seeing any need to doff caps at absolutely anything and everything that is set before us.
One: At the general level, football has changed mucho from when we were shit. Quite a lot is for the better. However, the game has sold part of its soul for silly money and naked commercialism. In such an environment, is it surprising if people are more "picky", more cynical of pumped-up idols and, in turn, less likely to give uncritical allegiance?
Two: Everything is relative. We're not on Stockport County resources, FFS. City have thrown sufficient money around to be judged against the most demanding standards. If and when we look to fall significantly short (and let's be honest, it has been known) why shouldn't people give voice?
We've practically reached the stage where no "elite" manager can be judged until he's purged the expensive squad he inherited and brought in his own favourites at vast additional expense. Those who manage on a shoestring are scorned as no-marks. Excuse me if some us with ordinary jobs and home lives don't feel particularly comfortable with those "values".
In summary, City operate in a rarefied and unreal world. They've brought us some fabulous players but don't own us. Many of us will continue to enjoy the good bits without seeing any need to doff caps at absolutely anything and everything that is set before us.