I genuinely didn't know he was playing until he was subbed off. When his name was read out, I thought he was coming onI really thought Nasri would have a real go as returning former City players do, but he was totally sh*t.
I genuinely didn't know he was playing until he was subbed off. When his name was read out, I thought he was coming onI really thought Nasri would have a real go as returning former City players do, but he was totally sh*t.
More like he was dizzy from spinning around trying to figure out where Bernardo had got to.The commentators we had on our stream said that the player Zaba replaced was suffering from sore calves.
I thought they were pretty shit, to be honest and we could have had 5 goals on another day
Nothing upfront, very little out-wide and the only thing they had going for them was a half decent keeper, City being wasteful and blocking shots/crosses. M
Give the lack of passion or heart he showed while wearing our shirt,his display against us came as no surprise whatsoever.I really thought Nasri would have a real go as returning former City players do, but he was totally sh*t.
I assumed he'd gone off injured, but then remembered I hadn't noticed he was even on the pitch, did he do anything ? Perhaps he showed us too much respect ?I really thought Nasri would have a real go as returning former City players do, but he was totally sh*t.
You looked decent enough anyway to me, gave us a better game than most have this season, kept it close till the end, and with a bit of luck you could have taken a point. That said we should have been 3 up inside 5 minutes, but we were back to our wasteful worst in that department.A fully fit side may have gave you more trouble, especially Arnaoutivic up top, Yarmelenko and Lanzini and a few others and we have the making of a very very good side.
Give the lack of passion or heart he showed while wearing our shirt,his display against us came as no surprise whatsoever.
I thought they were pretty shit, to be honest and we could have had 5 goals on another day
Nothing upfront, very little out-wide and the only thing they had going for them was a half decent keeper, City being wasteful and blocking shots/crosses. M
A bit unfair that as it depends on which aspect of their game you're looking at. I thought they offered less going forward than I expected but on the flip side they defended better than I expected.
Had a gander at their forum and it seems some have a low opinion of our fanbase these days based on about a dozen comments in the post match thread on here. Apparently we're self-entitled knobheads because the posters in question didn't spend enough column inches wanking off over the opposition, should've apologised profusely for being given a soft penalty, and the so-called good relationship we have with their fans is just us being patronising twats. Fuck me, I hope I never end up judging an entire fanbase based on the comments of a few people online. I wouldn't mind but the posts weren't THAT bad in the main compared to other post-match threads on here and arguably gave the Hammers more credit than our own team get following a routine 4-0 win ffs. And as much as I like West Ham and their fans, to talk about self-entitlement when many of them turned their noses up at Allardyce because he didn't play football the "West Ham way" smacks of pot, kettle, and black to me.