West Ham interested in Iheanacho

[MCFCFanTX]

To be honest, as long as there is a buyback clause I'd be ok with Iheanacho leaving. West Ham would be a good place for him to go, develop, play and hone his skills.

 

[its a Barm]

To be honest, as long as there is a buyback clause I'd be ok with Iheanacho leaving. West Ham would be a good place for him to go, develop, play and hone his skills.

why on earth would west ham agree to a buy back clause, so they buy for 20mill keep him for 2 years he scores them 30+ goals and we say think we will have him back for 20mill even though he is worth 40 now, dont think so.

 

[Father Paul]

Young players progress by playing regular games - e.g. Lukaku, Kane etc.

I do not think we have seen the best of him yet and I would have been interested to see him play as a 10 but too much competition there at City.

If we could loan him to a decent team (not one who which is obviously going to struggle all season) which would make him their main striker that would be great but it is unlikely to happen with a Premier League team. West Ham could be a good move for him and he should get plenty of game time.

I would reluctantly sell the lad with a buy back clause.

Don't know why some people seem to think that he is a ten. The weakest part of his game is his first touch and he is not that quick. The objective surely
is to feed him the ball in dangerous positions.

 

[Twingatz]

Don't know why some people seem to think that he is a ten. The weakest part of his game is his first touch and he is not that quick. The objective surely
is to feed him the ball in dangerous positions.

People say that he's a #10 because that's the position he plays for his country at all age groups including a few of his caps with the senior team.

The other deal is that his best position isn't even being a striker, it's being a second striker.

 

[BringBackSwales]

why on earth would west ham agree to a buy back clause, so they buy for 20mill keep him for 2 years he scores them 30+ goals and we say think we will have him back for 20mill even though he is worth 40 now, dont think so.

Because the buyback clause would be for a much higher value than they are paying

 

[sir baconface]

why on earth would west ham agree to a buy back clause, so they buy for 20mill keep him for 2 years he scores them 30+ goals and we say think we will have him back for 20mill even though he is worth 40 now, dont think so.

Not sure you've understood buy-back clauses. However, if they don't like it they can fcuk off. We're under no great pressure to sell.

 

[Kompany is King]

I think it's a good deal for all.

Iheanacho gets game time which he needs.

 

[Ashleymcduff]

Don't care about a buy back clause he will never be good enough at the very top level
Like
Gabby Jesus or mbappe

 

[Scar Tissue]

Saw a story somewhere a couple of days ago that Pep wanted to keep him. Is there any more on this or has the West Ham talk gathered strength?

 

[Tevez City]

20million is a good deal.