greasedupdeafguy said:Sinclair doesn't play apart from EDS matches, and Savic and Toure were beyond shite which is why we got another CB. We may as well just waited until January or next summer and gone all out for someone like Bale instead of buying a player for quite a high fee who's going to play around 10 games probably less. He didn't even start in the league cup ffs.CTID101 said:He probably could have but Mancini clearly didn't like or rate him so he won't play.greasedupdeafguy said:Yeh so to replace him we spend 6million on player who will only play against lower quality teams at home, couldn't Weiss have done a similar job?
Just because on paper it seems like we spent money for no reason there is a reason behind it and if you don't agree that is up to you.
Why did we buy Nastasic when we already had Kolo, Savic, Lescott and Kompany? We bought him because Mancini no longer wants Kolo and Savic. So we bring in a player. Mancini didn't want Weiss so we bring in Sinclair. Shocker as manager buys players he likes and wants rather than ones that he already has.
For the record I don't rate Weiss and he will never be a top player, Sinclair won't be either but for the times we need a quick winger to play a different style he will good for the role.
He wants to play regularly.