Which striker was worst value for money?

[u2fme2]

It has to be Vuoso 5 or 6 million and never played as far as i remember.

keagan made a few pound on that deal

 

[unitedrunaway]

nobody was really expecting jo to be any good tho were they?? i seen a bit before he signed and knew that he would flop...

 

[Blue Punter]

Bradbury

Take the R's out and there's the answer.

 

[uwerosler28]

nobody was really expecting jo to be any good tho were they?? i seen a bit before he signed and knew that he would flop...

you serious he was one of the best in the world just look at you tube and football manager bluemoons faithful scouting systems!

 

[unitedrunaway]

dead serious pal...... id play weel in russia,, and he only scored a decent goal once in champs lg vs inter,,, not good enough

 

[Corky]

Vuoso was closer to £2M down.

Fowler was the worst, not counting Jo.

Bob Taylor was a very good signing, played a few weeks, scored a few vital goals, got promoted and sold him.

 

[simonk]

Vuoso.

didnt have to look far to see the right answer.
Not read the rest but assume big fat bobby taylor and badbuy feature prominatley

 

[mcfc78]

i didnt want to put every single striker that had flopped.. just put a few in there for the debate...

 

[YankeeBlue]

Corradi

 

[squirtyflower]

Barry F'in Silkman, he has to go down as one of the worst buys, it gives me nightmares now nearly 30 years later, and he only cost three and tuppence!