Why are Africans such poor footballers?

nashark said:
Dannyctid said:
Oh my mistake now it's obvious you meant players who emigrated when they were 10 and learned how to play football in Europe. Can't believe I mis read it first time.
Well now that's cleared up I'm with you. All African players are rubbish(except the good ones)(and the ones who don't actually live in Africa any more)(and any who changed nationality)(and Roger Miller)

Could you explain to me why white men can't jump?

10 was just a ball park figure. I suspected that you realised players who play for France (national team) would not be classed as African (in footballing terms). When Vieira is playing for France do you remark what a great African midfielder he is?
You didn't answer my question so I'm not answering yours
 
Well your original comment does smack of racism abit, if you ment it or not it does seem like it is

Im not guilty, couldnt give a fook about what we did many years before i was alive, but racism is racism, which is also illigal

Not calling you a racist just saying your opening post does sound a bit racist
 
Re: Why are Africans such poor footballers? PLEASE READ THE OP.

nashark said:
nashark said:
There seems to be a trend. The majority of Africans are not good footballers.

NB: Footballer can be defined as having good feet, with a good first touch. Also, footballer is different from player. Player refers to the overall performance.

There are only a few exceptions. Drogba, Okocha and Kanu seem to be these. I can't really think of any more. Africans are predominantly big and fast, with average feet. The idea for the thread came after sheer despondency at the footballing ability of Kolo Toure, Salif Diao, Mamadou Sidibe and Adebayor to an extent (even though he is tall). Once again, why are Africans such poor footballers?
If that's your definition then I guess Brazilians might equally wonder the English are generally shite footballers. The answer is because of the football culture they're schooled in, ie Brazilians prefer control and trickery whereas the English favour pace and power.
 
BoyBlue_1985 said:
Well your original comment does smack of racism abit, if you ment it or not it does seem like it is

Im not guilty, couldnt give a fook about what we did many years before i was alive, but racism is racism, which is also illigal

Not calling you a racist just saying your opening post does sound a bit racist

Please please explain why. Is it because I alluded to the fact that there may be a difference between cultures.
 
Dannyctid said:
MCfcBOB said:
I don't think anyone understands his point, fully. I'm pretty sure he doesn't either.

Vieira was born in Dakar which is a pretty poor country. It's a good place but poor. Maybe this is what he means.
Dakar is in Senegal.................so not a country
 
Dannyctid said:
nashark said:
10 was just a ball park figure. I suspected that you realised players who play for France (national team) would not be classed as African (in footballing terms). When Vieira is playing for France do you remark what a great African midfielder he is?
You didn't answer my question so I'm not answering yours

I think men who originated from sub-saharan Africa have a greater percentage of fast twitch fibres. Now please answer mine?
 
What a fucking ridiculous racist post. Drogba, Okocha and Kanu are the only exceptions the OP can think of - well he needs to think a bit fucking harder before posting such drivel.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.