BlueMoonoverUS
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Jan 2012
- Messages
- 1,450
@GuillemBalague: Let's kill one argument: Pellegrini speaks very good English.
BlueMoonoverUS said:@GuillemBalague: Let's kill one argument: Pellegrini speaks very good English.
karen7 said:BlueMoonoverUS said:@GuillemBalague: Let's kill one argument: Pellegrini speaks very good English.
but has he won anything...no!
karen7 said:BlueMoonoverUS said:@GuillemBalague: Let's kill one argument: Pellegrini speaks very good English.
but has he won anything...no!
LoveCity said:karen7 said:BlueMoonoverUS said:@GuillemBalague: Let's kill one argument: Pellegrini speaks very good English.
but has he won anything...no!
Had Guardiola won anything? No!
Had Rijkaard? No!
Had Conte! No... well, yes, the Italian 2nd division.
Pellegrini actually won six trophies in three South America countries by the way, but in the Bluemoon world (the "Dutch football is shit because Samaras scored a few goals there" mob) this will be dismissed as tinpot pub football when the Argentine league (where he won the league with River Plate, a huge club) especially is ultra-competitive.
One thing I agree with Balague on is this: "The City decision 2 appoint Pellegrini, based on performance not results (i.e.,winning Cup). All football decisions should be taken that way."
Context (that word again) is regularly dismissed on Bluemoon, people can't see past trophy count and have no faith in the men running our club now, the main power players having transformed Barcelona from serial underachiever to the peak of world football after some VERY brave and some might say risky decisions.
Pellegrini is a fantastic coach who is respected all over Europe and has been praised by the likes of Pep Guardiola. It's a shame our fans can't see what Liverpool, Arsenal, and even United fans can - that he is a good coach and fits the vision/direction of City very well.
dave_blue12 said:2 good articles on what Pellegrini will bring
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/footb...in-depth-profile-1886701#.UZDvtFifbCY.twitter
http://aggbot.com/Manchester-City-News/article/19573258
So we're getting another Mancini then? but a less successful one.Structured, cautious attacking
Despite his emphasis upon technique, there is also a caution about Pellegrini's sides – they attack intelligently and methodically rather than frantically. Chile's current footballing style might be based around relentless attacking – Claudio Borghi and Jorge Sampaoli have continued Marcelo Bielsa's work – but having spent a decade in Europe, Pellegrini feels more like a Spanish coach than a Chilean coach.
His sides are also capable of defending solidly in two banks of four, and playing in a reactive and defensive manner. There is little doubt Pellegrini would embrace positive football at City, but he prefers controlled dominance rather than constant waves of attack.
LoveCity said:karen7 said:BlueMoonoverUS said:@GuillemBalague: Let's kill one argument: Pellegrini speaks very good English.
but has he won anything...no!
Had Guardiola won anything? No!
Had Rijkaard? No!
Had Conte! No... well, yes, the Italian 2nd division.
Pellegrini actually won six trophies in three South American countries by the way, but in the Bluemoon world (the "Dutch football is shit because Samaras scored a few goals there" mob) this will be dismissed as tinpot pub football when the Argentine league (where he won the league with River Plate, a huge club) especially is ultra-competitive.
One thing I agree with Balague on is this: "The City decision 2 appoint Pellegrini, based on performance not results (i.e.,winning Cup). All football decisions should be taken that way."
Context (that word again) is regularly dismissed on Bluemoon, people can't see past trophy count and have no faith in the men running our club now, the main power players having transformed Barcelona from serial underachiever to the peak of world football after some VERY brave and some might say risky decisions.
Pellegrini is a fantastic coach who is respected all over Europe and has been praised by the likes of Pep Guardiola. It's a shame our fans can't see what Liverpool, Arsenal, and even United fans can - that he is a good coach and fits the vision/direction of City very well. Give it a year and I have a feeling City fans will be in love with Pellegrini.
LoveCity said:karen7 said:BlueMoonoverUS said:@GuillemBalague: Let's kill one argument: Pellegrini speaks very good English.
but has he won anything...no!
Had Guardiola won anything? No!
Had Rijkaard? No!
Had Conte! No... well, yes, the Italian 2nd division.
Pellegrini actually won six trophies in three South American countries by the way, but in the Bluemoon world (the "Dutch football is shit because Samaras scored a few goals there" mob) this will be dismissed as tinpot pub football when the Argentine league (where he won the league with River Plate, a huge club) especially is ultra-competitive.
One thing I agree with Balague on is this: "The City decision 2 appoint Pellegrini, based on performance not results (i.e.,winning Cup). All football decisions should be taken that way."
Context (that word again) is regularly dismissed on Bluemoon, people can't see past trophy count and have no faith in the men running our club now, the main power players having transformed Barcelona from serial underachiever to the peak of world football after some VERY brave and some might say risky decisions.
Pellegrini is a fantastic coach who is respected all over Europe and has been praised by the likes of Pep Guardiola. It's a shame our fans can't see what Liverpool, Arsenal, and even United fans can - that he is a good coach and fits the vision/direction of City very well. Give it a year and I have a feeling City fans will be in love with Pellegrini.
mancity56 said:is it just me that thinks this would be the most horrific appointment our board could make ? he hasnt proven himself at all. he took a good malaga side to the quarters of the champions league ill give him that but what has he achieved. i would rather a di mateo or mourinho . is that just me ?