Why The Hell Would Anyone Want Mancini Sacked ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: The Reasons Why Mancini Won't Survive At City

Chippy_boy said:
RobertFish said:
Well put however I am not sure that Mourinho is the answer as I am doubtful he would stay long term.

Why would that matter? Serious question.

I know he's a cocky arrogant sod who's only in it for himself, but he delivers outstanding results. I don't remember too many Chelsea fans or players for that matter saying how shit it was when Mourinho was there. Most of them would have him back in a heartbeat.

So he'd come here for 2 or 3 years, we'd win everything, sign some massive players and he'd leave with us being a much better team. Would that be so terrible?
Do you think he has delivered outstanding results at madrid in his 3 years?
 
Re: The Reasons Why Mancini Won't Survive At City

The cookie monster said:
Chippy_boy said:
RobertFish said:
Well put however I am not sure that Mourinho is the answer as I am doubtful he would stay long term.

Why would that matter? Serious question.

I know he's a cocky arrogant sod who's only in it for himself, but he delivers outstanding results. I don't remember too many Chelsea fans or players for that matter saying how shit it was when Mourinho was there. Most of them would have him back in a heartbeat.

So he'd come here for 2 or 3 years, we'd win everything, sign some massive players and he'd leave with us being a much better team. Would that be so terrible?
Do you think he has delivered outstanding results at madrid in his 3 years?

Do you think he's not a very good manager?
 
Re: The Reasons Why Mancini Won't Survive At City

The cookie monster said:
Do you think he has delivered outstanding results at madrid in his 3 years?

He's got two European cups, he's won the league in Spain, England, Portugal, and Italy, and he's widely acknowledged as the best manager in the world.

It isn't a fluke that whilst Mancini is linked with Monaco and Russia Mourinho can pretty much write his own ticket for wherever he wants to go next.
 
Re: The Reasons Why Mancini Won't Survive At City

BillyShears said:
The cookie monster said:
Do you think he has delivered outstanding results at madrid in his 3 years?

He's got two European cups, he's won the league in Spain, England, Portugal, and Italy, and he's widely acknowledged as the best manager in the world.

It isn't a fluke that whilst Mancini is linked with Monaco and Russia Mourinho can pretty much write his own ticket for wherever he wants to go next.

After losing 3–2 in Barcelona in the first leg of the 2012 Supercopa de España, Real Madrid won the return leg in Madrid 2–1. Real Madrid won the competition on the away goals rule after a tie of 4–4 on aggregate. This meant Mourinho had won every domestic title available for a manager in the Spanish top division within two years. He became the only coach who has won the national Super Cups in four different European countries.[94] This also made Mourinho the first manager in history to win every domestic title, the league championship, cup, super cup, and league cup (if available), in four European leagues.
 
Re: The Reasons Why Mancini Won't Survive At City

Chippy_boy said:
The cookie monster said:
Chippy_boy said:
Why would that matter? Serious question.

I know he's a cocky arrogant sod who's only in it for himself, but he delivers outstanding results. I don't remember too many Chelsea fans or players for that matter saying how shit it was when Mourinho was there. Most of them would have him back in a heartbeat.

So he'd come here for 2 or 3 years, we'd win everything, sign some massive players and he'd leave with us being a much better team. Would that be so terrible?
Do you think he has delivered outstanding results at madrid in his 3 years?

Do you think he's not a very good manager?
Didnt i ask the question
Do you think he has delivered outstanding results
With the money he has spent do you think he has been a success or a failure?
 
Chippy_boy said:
Berkovic_blue said:
Chippy_boy said:
I think you have rose coloured glasses on. Or blue ones.

We were shite last year as well. We were extremely fortunate to get to 7 points when 3 of them were from a 90th minute rescue against Villareal at home. And then 3 more when Bayern threw the last game by playing their B side. 10 points flattered us and I am not sure we would have got 10 had Bayern werent already through.

This season we were *battered* in Madrid by a very poor Real side. Yes we might have fluked a win or a point, but it would have been a travesty.

The only game we were unlucky in was Ajax at home, where I do believe we were robbed by some duff refereeing. You would be right to ask why we had to come from 2 down in the first place though.

If you're going to start discounting legitimate victories to fit your agenda then obviously you'll be doing the same regarding the title win?

Eh? Do you actually disagree with anything I say above, and if so which line exactly?

Are you suggesting that last year we played great in the CL?

And by the way, yes, I do have reservations about how we won the league last year. Had we not battered the rags at OT, we would have lost it. As it stood, we and they played 36 games against the same opponents and they managed 6 points more than us in those games, and that was without Vidic for most of the season and with a camel in goal (and no RVP). With our players we should have walked it last year.
Regarding the last sentence or two of your post.
Football isn't that predictable though is it?Otherwise an average Chelsea side wouldn't have won the Champions league,Celtic wouldn't have beaten Barca etc.
We won the title last year because we were the best team whether it was on G.D or by 10 points is irrelevant.
 
Re: The Reasons Why Mancini Won't Survive At City

BillyShears said:
The cookie monster said:
Do you think he has delivered outstanding results at madrid in his 3 years?

He's got two European cups, he's won the league in Spain, England, Portugal, and Italy, and he's widely acknowledged as the best manager in the world.

It isn't a fluke that whilst Mancini is linked with Monaco and Russia Mourinho can pretty much write his own ticket for wherever he wants to go next.
I would have another read of my question billy.
 
Re: The Reasons Why Mancini Won't Survive At City

The cookie monster said:
BillyShears said:
The cookie monster said:
Do you think he has delivered outstanding results at madrid in his 3 years?

He's got two European cups, he's won the league in Spain, England, Portugal, and Italy, and he's widely acknowledged as the best manager in the world.

It isn't a fluke that whilst Mancini is linked with Monaco and Russia Mourinho can pretty much write his own ticket for wherever he wants to go next.
I would have another read of my question billy.

I don't need to. I read it fine the first time. Just showing you the caliber of the guy who's achievements you're attempting to belittle with little success... ;)
 
Re: The Reasons Why Mancini Won't Survive At City

The cookie monster said:
Chippy_boy said:
RobertFish said:
Well put however I am not sure that Mourinho is the answer as I am doubtful he would stay long term.

Why would that matter? Serious question.

I know he's a cocky arrogant sod who's only in it for himself, but he delivers outstanding results. I don't remember too many Chelsea fans or players for that matter saying how shit it was when Mourinho was there. Most of them would have him back in a heartbeat.

So he'd come here for 2 or 3 years, we'd win everything, sign some massive players and he'd leave with us being a much better team. Would that be so terrible?
Do you think he has delivered outstanding results at madrid in his 3 years?

Sorry to jump into your debate - Yes he has
 
Re: The Reasons Why Mancini Won't Survive At City

BillyShears said:
The cookie monster said:
BillyShears said:
He's got two European cups, he's won the league in Spain, England, Portugal, and Italy, and he's widely acknowledged as the best manager in the world.

It isn't a fluke that whilst Mancini is linked with Monaco and Russia Mourinho can pretty much write his own ticket for wherever he wants to go next.
I would have another read of my question billy.

I don't need to. I read it fine the first time. Just showing you the caliber of the guy who's achievements you're attempting to belittle with little success... ;)

I think his point is that great managers sometimes don't win everything Mourinho by his standards could be accused of under performing at Madrid in Europe especially.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.