Why The Hell Would Anyone Want Mancini Sacked ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
LoveCity said:
The Guardian says tonight his job is not under any immediate threat at all and there is a degree of understanding from Khaldoon. But does say there is added pressure to win the league now.

Oh, good news, the Guardian has spoken.

Honestly how the **** would they know what is going on in the minds of our Chairman and owner. First, I don't doubt for one nanosecond that they haven't actually spoken to either of them.

And second, had they done so (although we know they didn't), Khaldoon or Mansour are hardly likely to have said to the Guardian "we are going to sack him in January, but don't tell anyone. We trust you because you are a national newspaper".

Of course they would have said Mancini has their backing. Although, like I said, the conversation likely never took place anyway.

What a total waste if time of an article.
 
Didsbury Dave said:
Danielmanc said:
TCIB said:
Your correct, Didsbury Dave trying to lie to enforce his point shocker.

<a class="postlink" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/europe/7426549.stm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 426549.stm</a>

Does he have any credibility as a poster left because i sure as shit gave up reading his boring monotonous mantra type posts regarding Mancini a long time ago.

I don't think anyone gives two shits (or even one) about what he thinks / posts

PMSL. Who the fucking hell are you?

I've got a little nipping squad of young nobodies on my tail tonight. ;-)

Maybe one day they can grow up to be well known on an internet forum. Living the dream!
 
OB1 said:
Davs 19 said:
citykev28 said:
I might be wrong but I'm sure he was sacked for announcing he was quitting and then going back on his word.

Nail on head Kev.

Sorry but didn't Mancini quit etc because he got wind of the fact that Inter were looking to replace him because he failed to progress in the UCL? In other words, wasn't the undelying reason for his departure exactly as DD suggests?

Sssshhh.

They 'blew me out the water', don't spoil it with the truth ;-)
 
Davs 19 said:
Didsbury Dave said:
citykev28 said:
My first ever reply to him and I've already blown him out of the water.

Blown out the water, eh? Go and find out when and why mourinho was approached and agreed to take the inter job. And have a little think as to why league winner Mancini resigned, took it back and then was sacked. Ask about the player revolt, took

You haven't a clue mate.

Everyone knows why he was really sacked.


Apart from your good self apparently. You're currently resembling a drowning man going down for the third time.

lol this. He's having an absolute mare.
 
Didsbury Dave said:
OB1 said:
Davs 19 said:
Nail on head Kev.

Sorry but didn't Mancini quit etc because he got wind of the fact that Inter were looking to replace him because he failed to progress in the UCL? In other words, wasn't the undelying reason for his departure exactly as DD suggests?

Sssshhh.

They 'blew me out the water', don't spoil it with the truth ;-)

Didsbury Dave in arrogant knob jockey shocker !<br /><br />-- Wed Dec 05, 2012 11:41 pm --<br /><br />
Berkovic_blue said:
Davs 19 said:
Didsbury Dave said:
Blown out the water, eh? Go and find out when and why mourinho was approached and agreed to take the inter job. And have a little think as to why league winner Mancini resigned, took it back and then was sacked. Ask about the player revolt, took

You haven't a clue mate.

Everyone knows why he was really sacked.


Apart from your good self apparently. You're currently resembling a drowning man going down for the third time.

lol this. He's having an absolute mare.

Same old !
 
Chippy_boy said:
LoveCity said:
The Guardian says tonight his job is not under any immediate threat at all and there is a degree of understanding from Khaldoon. But does say there is added pressure to win the league now.

Oh, good news, the Guardian has spoken.

Honestly how the **** would they know what is going on in the minds of our Chairman and owner. First, I don't doubt for one nanosecond that they haven't actually spoken to either of them.

And second, had they done so (although we know they didn't), Khaldoon or Mansour are hardly likely to have said to the Guardian "we are going to sack him in January, but don't tell anyone. We trust you because you are a national newspaper".

Of course they would have said Mancini has their backing. Although, like I said, the conversation likely never took place anyway.

What a total waste if time of an article.

If it said the opposite you'd be lauding it as a great scoop
 
Chippy_boy said:
LoveCity said:
The Guardian says tonight his job is not under any immediate threat at all and there is a degree of understanding from Khaldoon. But does say there is added pressure to win the league now.

Oh, good news, the Guardian has spoken.

Honestly how the **** would they know what is going on in the minds of our Chairman and owner. First, I don't doubt for one nanosecond that they haven't actually spoken to either of them.

And second, had they done so (although we know they didn't), Khaldoon or Mansour are hardly likely to have said to the Guardian "we are going to sack him in January, but don't tell anyone. We trust you because you are a national newspaper".

Of course they would have said Mancini has their backing. Although, like I said, the conversation likely never took place anyway.

What a total waste if time of an article.

Leave it till tomorrow chippy when the decent posters are back ;-)
 
LoveCity said:
And the Daily Star (yes, I know) says Mourinho has no chance of getting the City job if Mancini goes due to Txiki and Soriano not liking him and the baggage he brings. They will want a squeaky clean image and youth development -> Pep or Klopp (if Mancini is replaced)

The Star may well be right. For once I hope they are, even though it's clearly an opinion rather than inside knowledge.
 
It's funny that people keep referring to phallic symbols such as knob, dick, "blown", tosser etc. Some Freudian psychology going on there.
 
Damocles said:
Didsbury Dave said:
Danielmanc said:
I don't think anyone gives two shits (or even one) about what he thinks / posts

PMSL. Who the fucking hell are you?

I've got a little nipping squad of young nobodies on my tail tonight. ;-)

Maybe one day they can grow up to be well known on an internet forum. Living the dream!

That's right - when I grow up I want to be a faultless footie genius like the famous and widely respected Didsbury Dave :-)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.