There are many reasons . Frankly I look askance at that piece of analysis.OB1 said:bluefandk said:...there are perhaps a handfull of manegers in the world who are at the same level as Mancini and none of them would guarentee better results than Mancini.
Mancini wins trophies, manegers like that are very hard to come by so I think we should stick with him, will Mancini Guarantee success? obviusly not but there is no such guarantee to be had which seems to be what the outers want.
So why are there eight Premier League managers that the Fink Tank calculates have overachieved in the league; whereas Mancini is rated as doing what City's wage bill would suggest he does?
Why couldn't some of those managers have achieved what Mancini has if they had his resources?
Edit: If you're looking for a specific reason, it's the indication that success is like a machine you insert coins into until you have your desired result.