80s Shorts
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,616
tolmie's hairdoo said:80s Shorts said:tolmie's hairdoo said:It would be wrong to label me as anti-Mancini, mate, certainly someone who has always had it in for him.
As I stated, his likeability is the one thing which puts the reign on me. He is a classy guy.
I simply have more reservations than answers during his tenure, most notably for me, city are a unique one-off in football history.
I do believe many results are in spite of him, not because of him.
We have an extraordinary group of players who can flick the switch on and off when the mood takes.
I still hold doubts the switch remains off too often.
Which is a scary prospect for our rivals!
You cannot seriously say you are not anti Mancini then in the same post say you believe many results are in spite of him and not because of him. Doesnt make sense.
Well it does to me;)
Maybe I phrased it wrong and can concede the contradiction in terms.
Simply put, I feel our squad is so good, there are times when Mancini only has to sit back and admire v cannon fodder.
However, I feel in his basic role as manager, he sometimes does not keep on top of them and crack the whip when needed.
A top racehorse can run fast with or without a rider in situ, but will have a better chance if someone is telling it when to bide its time, when to go, and when it needs to recognise use of a whip.
He's admitted it himself, to his credit, following Everton result, that he can underestimate both his own players and opposition.
I've yet to meet a blue who is anti-Mancini. The only people who accuse it seem to be those who can't accept others may not appreciate him as they do.
The post Everton comments were to deflect from a poor performance as well you know. Thankyou for conceding the fact that you contradicted yourself tho.