Wolves (H) Post Match Thread

Blue Llama said:
It definitely favours the defense. The natural position for an attacking player is to face the goal and lean in that direction. Its the opposite for a defender. So when the positions are compared if the players are more or less in line the attacker is going to be penalised. Its against the spirit of attacking football and completely daft.
Click to expand...
That I agree with. My post that you quote was to someone suggesting the tech was bent (as lots of people don’t understand perspective).
 
Been done before....but...
Man City...might as well be Millport Amateurs! (Aug 1970)
 

Attachments

  • 131807ED-E019-4273-96F1-C7779CC02660.jpeg
    131807ED-E019-4273-96F1-C7779CC02660.jpeg
    37.2 KB · Views: 45
I think collectively we gave the ball away far too much. Nip that in the bud, speed up the approach play and bang!! Good 3 points against a 'dogged' Wolves team - see what I did there? ;D
 
SWP's back said:
Wasnt his hand. Was his sleeve line.

View attachment 11658
Click to expand...
That offside just looks....wrong. If you remove all the lines and just look at the photo, anyone who impartially sees that would say it's onside. From where Laporte is standing, for his upper arm to be deemed offside beyond the Wolves player's boot, he would have to be leaning forward to the point of overbalancing. And he didn't overbalance.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.