Harsh penalty for me. I though they were investigating Kane's two non penalty's anyway, what happened there?
They've hired UEFA's crack investigation team and are now working hand in hand with Merseyside Police to get to the bottom of it
Harsh penalty for me. I though they were investigating Kane's two non penalty's anyway, what happened there?
In rugby, they would say " the ball played the man" no penalty!The reason it shouldn't be given for me, its headed and hit him all in a fraction of a second.
Don't think so, and its a good point, does it put the referee under pressure ?Has a ref been called over to the VAR screen and then stuck with his original decision as yet?
Would have been won earlier if VAR was used correctly.the match we won ?
I agree with that, it should be transparent as it is in cricket.In any case we should be hearing the discussions, how do we know there isn't some FIFA official in that room saying "it would be good for tournament if the aussies get on level terms", or worse "I've got a $500 on 1-1 at half time" ?
Don't think so, but to be fair the VAR officials aren't calling them over without good reason.Has a ref been called over to the VAR screen and then stuck with his original decision as yet?
That guy Cruz for Australia is utter shit. Everything he does ends in dismal failure. He’s the worst player I have seen so far.
I saw your thoughts in previous post, I just think that pen was particularly harsh, and consequently shouldn’t have been given. He didn’t move his arm in the direction of the ball and it’s impossible to jump that height without your arms going out to the sides. Of course, I agree it can be classed as unnatural, I just think there was enough of a doubt to leave with onfield original decision.Don't think so, but to be fair the VAR officials aren't calling them over without good reason.