World Cup 2018 | 21st June Matches | Next Match: Argentina vs Croatia, KO 19:00 (BST)

[cleavers]

his hand was level with his head and in an unnatural position

Very hard not to have your hand up when jumping that height, and its hit him from about a foot away from the guys head, but hey ho. We'd (City) never get that given to us in that situation. I want to hear the reasoning behind the decision to change the decision, did the referee miss it, or did he see it and not give it initially, why did the VAR official ask him to look again, was it for interpretation of the rules, or because he missed it. My issue is we need to hear the reasons for changing a decision. A room full of pundits can't agree either, and clattenburg says no penalty too.

As has been said earlier in the thread, its now a very convenient way to change a scoreline, for any number of reasons.

 

[willipp]

His hand is at head height and away from his body, it's not in a natural position. If you jump like that defending in your own area you're taking a risk.

Watching the replay and im still not so sure. Even the pundits can't agree, which for me shows its not a clear mistake and therefore shouldn't be overturned. Clattenburg (i know) even thinks its not a pen.

 

[Magicpole]

I was just raging about not being there, now this? Was it a penalty? Yes.

Would I be raging to lose one like that? Yes.

Am I still raging?

 

[cleavers]

the distance between the opponent and the ball (unexpected ball)

The reason it shouldn't be given for me, its headed and hit him all in a fraction of a second.

 

[Magicpole]

That guy Cruz for Australia is utter shit. Everything he does ends in dismal failure. He’s the worst player I have seen so far.

 

[lancs blue]

Clattenburg (i know) even thinks its not a pen.

He has no input to this debate after the one he gave when the ball hit Raheem's ribs!

 

[inchy14]

the match we won ?

Sorry but you can't use us actually winning to prove VAR wasn't used to try and shaft England, or should i just say wasn't used.........

Those decisions were bent as fuck.

 

[aguero93:20]

Watching the replay and im still not so sure. Even the pundits can't agree, which for me shows its not a clear mistake and therefore shouldn't be overturned. Clattenburg (i know) even thinks its not a pen.

Clattenburg has admitted he made up the rules to suit his own narrative as he went along. He once sent one of our players off simply because he didn't like him.

 

[paulchapo]

Harsh penalty for me. I though they were investigating Kane's two non penalty's anyway, what happened there?

 

[lancs blue]

Harsh penalty for me. I though they were investigating Kane's two non penalty's anyway, what happened there?

The second one on Kane wouldn't have been given anyway as Stones clearly shoved a defender out of the way just before the hold on Kane.