D
D
Deleted member 77198
Guest
Yeah it’s bollocks mate. Playing the race card is letting them off the hook for what’s really going on. The Liverpool [and United] sycophants in the media are ubiquitous and make my skin itch. That’s why I ignore them, but they aren’t being racist towards Raheem, never been about that. It’s been about daring to leave Liverpool and come to City. It’s like he’s committed football treason by showing up their darling club as being worthy of sacking off to better himself to come to us. His actions make a joke of their constant narrative of how special Liverpool are. So they slander him, they slag him off and they try and ruin him.Also Ive read on here many times that the media are racist and therefore unfair to Sterling due to the colour of his skin, if this is a valid reason then why are they kind to Rashford ?
But race - nah. Not for me.
They big Rashford up because he plays for United. They used to do it with Sterling when he was at Liverpool. I actually didn’t want us to sign Sterling because I thought he was overrated and nothing special, just that the media used to bang on about him all the time because he played for Liverpool.
I remember when we were all slagging him off on here when Sky Sports showed this image:
Our comments were things like “look how they’ve made him bigger than our players” “they overrate him because he plays for them” “he’s got nothing in our Dave” “he runs like a girl” “he’s fucking shit”... none of us were being racist, just anti-media and anti-Liverpool. And we aren’t being racist towards Rashford when we slag him off neither.
Last edited by a moderator: