CityInWashingtonState
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Aug 2017
- Messages
- 2,624
- Team supported
- Manchester City is my team - until I fucking die.
As a neutral outsider, Zlatan's claims make no sense. Why would any successful manager, out-of-the-blue decide one day to bench a star player with no explanation whatsoever?According to Zlatan, the problem was no communication. Zlatan breaking records, scoring at will, then all of the sudden benched. Nothing about why, no information about what he needed to improve, no explanation.
Many footballers are egos and idiots. Maybe Pep just can't be arsed to spend time and energy on idiots?
Some of Zlatan's claims do ring true - Pep's avoidance about talking to him after this fallout seems true.
What I think transpired is that Pep was forced to choose between building a team around Zlatan or around Messi. Once having chosen Messi, Pep likely instructed Zlatan how to play to fit in to his expectations - i.e., by taking up a supporting role. Zlatan's ego is such that he'd ignore such advice. Eventually, Pep decided that Zlatan wasn't playing in a manner that helped the team get the best out of Messi's abilities - and Zlatan got less and less playing time.
Equally, Pep avoided talking to Zlatan about this situation, not wanting to get into a heated, emotional confrontation. Pep's solution - trade Zlatan.
=====
I haven't read Zlatan's book - but I've read portions or synopses of portions about the book on the Internet.
Some of Zlatan's quotes around this incident are supposedly along the lines of:
"Pep is not a man. If he were a man he wouldn't be afraid to talk to me."
"Pep is a coward. I wanted to talk to him man-to-man and settle it."
"I'm 6'-5". If that coward Pep would have talked to me, I'd have settled things man-to-man."
Etc.
I'm paraphrasing... but it's clear that any discussion of this topic with Zlatan would have been heated and may well have resulted in physical confrontation. Pep simply didn't want to endure such a confrontation.
Last edited: