Marvin said:
I think the Times have it wrong given what we know the agent has said now, and in the past. Are Arsenal going to pay more than City?
£29 Million for Yaya, and we think it's too much when we're bidding £20 Million plus for Milner. Paid more han that for Robinho. Were going to pay record feews for Kaka, Ronaldinho, Torres etc.
I think there must be more to this transfer than that. Saw an interesting post on this board from a Gooner which said that their President is about to change tenure...in days. Perhaps this is complicating matters, and the agent is now thryin to force this through before the new man comes in, with different ideas?
I don't know, but it's not making sense. We've shown a willingness to pay bigger fees than this in the past, and this is a really top player - will be our biggest potential signing to date - so there must be more to it.
it makes some sense to me. Platini's rules mean it's not a case of 'we're loaded so who cares?'. We have to make the sums work. Players don't have an absolute value. they are like everything else, if you are selling, they are worth what someone will pay you, no more, no less. Villa don't want to sell Milner, they have almost no need to. So we have to pay megabucks to make it worth them selling. Not to mention that Milner is 'home-grown' uk player, so carries an additional value. And other clubs have shown interest, so that drives up the price.
On the other hand Barca apparently have a pressing need to get cash for their Fabregas deal, Yaya doesn't want to stay and play second fiddle. I don't honestly think there is as much interest as his agent says, he is a good player but he would cost top dollar, and not many clubs who can afford him are looking for that sort of player.
Second thing is that when a club is working out how much they will pay for a player, they surely look at the whole cost, not just the fee. So the cost of buying Milner would be 25m, plus 100k p/w for 5 years, plus say a couple of million in fees, and on the other side of the balance sheet you'd say, he could be sold in three years time for the same amount of money. For yaya, say the fee was 29m. I reckon he'd want 140k ish p/w, which is 2m a year, 10m over five years. And I bet the agent is asking for a huge fee. He's 26 now so in four years time his value will have dropped significantly.... the difference in the headline fee might be 4m but overall it could easily be that he'd cost 20m more. City might very well look at Moussa Sissokho and say, hmm, he's not as good, but he could do the job, and he'd cost 30-40m less overall.