Oh yes it does.
For a racist anti-semite like Azeem to accuse others of being racist towards him is exceptionally hypocritical.
What's that I hear? But he said those comments when he was younger? Well surprise surprise, so did the individuals he has accused. They aren't absolved and now neither is he.
Should racism in cricket be investigated? Absolutely. Should it be addressed and eradicated? Absolutely. Should Azeem Rafiq's accounts be given ANY credit or acknowledgement after it has been proven he too was guilty in the exact same behaviour he has accused others of doing to him? Absolutely fucking not.
He's an antisemite who was racist to others and is now crying about receiving racist abuse himself. Goose and gander spring to mind in his case. He deserves no more attention on this subject. He's not the poster boy of addressing racism in sport some are still clinging on to. He's raised an important issue, yes, but after this revelation, his part is the conversation is over. Why should we acknowledge a racists opinion about racism in sport?
I doesn't change anything.
The issue here is that YCCC had an open culture of racially abusing people, that the club turned a blind eye when that was reported, and that the ECB let the club govern itself despite history showing that they weren't fit to for that.
If Azeem Rafiq was openly anti-semitic every single day, the only difference is there was another type of racism ignored by the county.
Should Azeem Rafiq's accounts be given ANY credit or acknowledgement after it has been proven he too was guilty in the exact same behaviour he has accused others of doing to him?
As for this nonsense, this is why Rafiq has corroboration for his accusations. Do you believe Michael Vaughan now? Because 2 other players back up Rafiqs version.
Do you want to pretend Gary Ballance and Hoggard didn't admit to regularly racially abusing him?