Krieng_Thai OSC said:From what I see, it is not zone marking; it is combination of zone and man marking.
When the ball comes to your zone, you do man marking.
When ball's played outside you zone, you move along with zone to close the opening gap.
It’s more advanced and need more organized. You have to sense your teammate whether ball and player now in your zone or his zone. And if it is his zone you have your own responsibility of who coming in and going out from your own zone.
And when ball comes to your zone, you cannot miss your man-to-man marking, other wise they simply tear you apart.
Concentration and eye contact with you teammate including move fast to form the zone again is the key.
Project said:Krieng_Thai OSC said:From what I see, it is not zone marking; it is combination of zone and man marking.
When the ball comes to your zone, you do man marking.
When ball's played outside you zone, you move along with zone to close the opening gap.
It’s more advanced and need more organized. You have to sense your teammate whether ball and player now in your zone or his zone. And if it is his zone you have your own responsibility of who coming in and going out from your own zone.
And when ball comes to your zone, you cannot miss your man-to-man marking, other wise they simply tear you apart.
Concentration and eye contact with you teammate including move fast to form the zone again is the key.
What you have just described IS zonal marking, not a mixture of the two. You're not supposed to stand there like a lemming in your defined area (unless you are Liverpool).
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader said:Man-marking only needs one to go awol and you're done. Zonal at least gives us some leeway. Would zonal marking have prevented the 99th min goal by ZimmerMan at the Swamp.