Last I checked, Sterling has far more, and more successful, take ons than Sane.Sane has been a bit of a lazy bastard for a lot of games recently,I'll grant you that,but when he has a few moments of magic,and you have seen them as well,he excites us all,I mean going attacking a full back and nearly getting a cross in,is far better than seeing Sterling either run with the ball and fall over,or beat his man,then come all the way back up the line to try and beat him again,going away from goal,then inevitable pass to our full back,yea sound that
You're describing the opposite players. Sane is as frustrating as can be one on one, at least with Sterling he takes his man on more often than not. Played into space, Sane turns it on, played into feet and he slows down something fierce far too often.
Sterling "attacks the full back and tries to get a cross in" far more often than Sane, and more successfully.