Media coverage 2018/19

Status
Not open for further replies.
"Pablo Pablo Pablo Pablo Pablo Pablo Pablo Pablo Pablo."

Someone tell that presenter with Pablo, Terry and Redknapp it's Pablo not fuckin Paolo.. called him it about 10 times during the show.
 
The media would have been praying for a Chelsea win by any means,as they would have wanted to ram down our throats or a stick to beat us with no chance of a quadruple,not saying we will do it,but glad these cnuts cant gloat over it for the time being ...
 
Souness went down hugely in my estimation today.

Turning into an odd old bully.
 
Souness went down hugely in my estimation today.

Turning into an odd old bully.

I was surprised by him today. This is the pressure the Scousers now feel under. It’s almost as if it’s becoming too much for them . They want it so bad they are hurting.
 
He’s feeling the pressure,just like a lot of pro scouse pundits,throw in their fans as well and surely you would think it must be filtering down to the players as well I for one hope it is ....
Do you remember after we beat Palace away(the day Stevie slipped)?..Souness went on a mad one saying we didn’t put in a performance like potential champions. We had just won 2-0 away at Palace and dominated the game. He is usually quite good to listen to but he can’t keep a cool head when the pressure is on his beloved club.
 
Do you remember after we beat Palace away(the day Stevie slipped)?..Souness went on a mad one saying we didn’t put in a performance like potential champions. We had just won 2-0 away at Palace and dominated the game. He is usually quite good to listen to but he can’t keep a cool head when the pressure is on his beloved club.
Yeah, we were disgraceful for not going gung ho at 2-0 up and giving Palace a way back into the game, that was pathetic from him. Fast forward a few days and Liverpool put in a real performance of champions at Palace, throwing away a 3-0 lead to draw by being too gung ho and failing to respect the ability of the opposition.
 
Damned if we do, damned if we dont.

I expect to see pieces saying have we blown our season by playing a strong team and the injuries today.

Will just a league cup satisfy the owners?

If Pep only wins one trophy has he failed?

There you go Mr Durham. Three choices for your show tomorrow.
 
Best piece of fiction i have "red" since Hans Christian Andersen
Check your facts and do your own research before posting nonsense.
And get yerself a copy of Doyles autobiography .read it.and...check Citys history from the relevant years.......then come back to me jmmy grim.
 
Last edited:
Ian Herbert in the DM doing a job on us on all fronts the scouse loving wanker. Basically slagging our achievements, attitude, owners, money spent, cups and trophies won but not retained, trophies we might win, league cup/mickey mouse cup except when it was part of the dippers treble, pep, the players, in fact in one article he really couldn’t have fitted any more slaggings
Yes.but there is no agenda.....
 
According to BBC website Raz didn't score? Did I watch a different game?

"Ilkay Gundogan, Sergio Aguero and Bernardo Silva scored from the spot for City"
 
Just reading the Guardian report this morning. Other than half the report focusing on the Chelsea goalie petulance, it reads as if Chelsea were the better team. Player ratings for Chelsea total 67, for City 63. How, then, did we have more possession, more shots, the only shots on target, more corners, AND... WIN THE BLOODY TROPHY?
 
Just reading the Guardian report this morning. Other than half the report focusing on the Chelsea goalie petulance, it reads as if Chelsea were the better team. Player ratings for Chelsea total 67, for City 63. How, then, did we have more possession, more shots, the only shots on target, more corners, AND... WIN THE BLOODY TROPHY?
Because... they always give higher marks to the underdogs if they get a close result just like the second leg against Burton...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top