Media coverage 2018/19

[masterwig]

Just the FA Cup left for us now the rags have won the Champions League and the Scousers already won the league in December.

Pep out.

 

[Rochdale Blue]

The MEN website today is like a rag fanzine.

That's why I will be avoiding all the media and deleting podcasts over the next few days, apart from anything involving City. I believe the Guardian are going to do an hatchet job special on us today if anyone's interested.

 

[paulchapo]

The MEN website today is like a rag fanzine.

Every newspaper is.

 

[squirtyflower]

That's why I will be avoiding all the media and deleting podcasts over the next few days, apart from anything involving City. I believe the Guardian are going to do an hatchet job special on us today if anyone's interested.

What’s the hatchet job this time?

 

[Rochdale Blue]

What’s the hatchet job this time?

On Tuesdays podcast they said they were bringing in someone (forget who) to explain City's shady dealings. They also had a dig at City supporters defending the club when in their opinion the accused doesn't have the right to any defence in their kangaroo court.

 

[squirtyflower]

On Tuesdays podcast they said they were bringing in someone (forget who) to explain City's shady dealings. They also had a dig at City supporters defending the club when in their opinion the accused doesn't have the right to any defence in their kangaroo court.

Probably in response to PB’s defence
I’ll not bother with them anymore then.

 

[bluealf]

Every newspaper is.

And the BBC news on the radio.

Fucking ****s

 

[The perfect fumble]

We need to put this in perspective, I'm sure we all remember the media gushing about City's glorious fight back from 2-1 down, with a man sent off, to score two corkers in the dying minutes of the Schalke game.

I know I do.

 

[The Riot Club]

On Tuesdays podcast they said they were bringing in someone (forget who) to explain City's shady dealings. They also had a dig at City supporters defending the club when in their opinion the accused doesn't have the right to any defence in their kangaroo court.

The Guardian gets worse every week. Unless you're a disabled refugee lesbian the Guardian will criticise. It's just the other extreme to the tabloid filth peddled by shit like the Sun and Mail. The one thing all of these bullshit media has in common is rag sycophancy.

 

[Andrew___K]

The Guardian gets worse every week. Unless you're a disabled refugee lesbian the Guardian will criticise. It's just the other extreme to the tabloid filth peddled by shit like the Sun and Mail. The one thing all of these bullshit media has in common is rag sycophancy.

Another fresh example. It's hilarious, as in fact United's starting 11 yesterday cost more than PSG's according to Transfermarkt!

 

[argyle]

Another fresh example. It's hilarious, as in fact United's starting 11 yesterday cost more than PSG's according to Transfermarkt!

I just saw that.

Rags as plucky underdogs, lol!

Every paper/website of the national media is stuffed full of sycophantic rags and 'pool fans.

 

[Blue Mist]

Another fresh example. It's hilarious, as in fact United's starting 11 yesterday cost more than PSG's according to Transfermarkt!

Every single reply slaughters the idiot. What a stupid article and only brings his 'newspaper'further into disrepute

 

[Manc baggie]

Every newspaper is.

Daily mail online has 30 rag articles before you get to the 1 and only (as far as I could see) article on City.
Even by that ‘newspapers’ rabid standards, it is quite ridiculous.

 

[tonea2003]

Another fresh example. It's hilarious, as in fact United's starting 11 yesterday cost more than PSG's according to Transfermarkt!

unless i've missed something in the starting 11's i get 413(psg) to 304(rag) using transfermkt

but by any stretch of the imagination no way are rags the underpriviliged underdogs

 

[aguero93:20]

unless i've missed something in the starting 11's i get 413(psg) to 304(rag) using transfermkt

Are you using transfermarkts valuation of the player (top left of the page) or the transfer fee they cost to buy?

 

[tonea2003]

Are you using transfermarkts valuation of the player (top left of the page) or the transfer fee they cost to buy?

cost to buy mate, i would add its in euro's

 

[aguero93:20]

cost to buy mate, i would add its in euro's

I've just gone through them there and it's £325.2m for PSG. The squad page shows current market value, hence why the academy right back is 31m and Buffon and Alves have values.

Edit, Rags around 280.

 

[paulchapo]

Daily mail online has 30 rag articles before you get to the 1 and only (as far as I could see) article on City.
Even by that ‘newspapers’ rabid standards, it is quite ridiculous.

I avoid all tv and media when they win. If it is a big win like last night it is horrendous.

 

[tonea2003]

I've just gone through them there and it's £325.2m for PSG. The squad page shows current market value, hence why the academy right back is 31m and Buffon and Alves have values.

Edit, Rags around 280.

however it is, for those to cite the rags in some david v goliath role is embarrassingly laughable

 

[Groke]

Another fresh example. It's hilarious, as in fact United's starting 11 yesterday cost more than PSG's according to Transfermarkt!

2 of the goals scored by a £75m striker, a mere snip. united 'not about money', christ that's up there with the biggest pile of steaming shite i've read. United are one of the ringleaders in making football all about greed and business.