UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

[@BluePhil8]

But it doesn't exist so it can't be illegal under EU law, can it?

Meant to write 'how was this' rather than 'how is this'

 

[oakiecokie]

The petition will be next.

You forgot to add "and candles".

 

[burning blue soul]

The G14 doesn't exist any more so it's irrelevant.

not in that name, but it does exist.

 

[mat]

You forgot to add "and candles".

Saving them in case Spurs VAR robs them in Madrid.

 

[Chi-town blues]

B2b treble .
Thank you cvnts

 

[TheRemainsOfTheDave]

Madrid, United, Arsenal, Bayern are all behind it. There have been secret meetings that have excluded ourselves around what needs to be done to stop the influx of new ownership to clubs who are not in the G-14 circle

They haven't been able to destabilise us this season as we have successfully retained the title, now they are bringing to the front the UEFA investigation as a massive PR attempt to destabilise the club and (as they will hope) play a negative impact on the summer transfer window along with damaging our clubs reputation

Liverpool, Arsenal and United were at this sort of thing 100 years ago - they aren't going to change, it's in their DNA.

 

[doobyedoobye]

I hope this makes Pep stay for another 10 years to ensure justice is served. He strikes me as the kind of man that would like to make a stand.

 

[Ducado]

I am not that concerned about this latest attack, but what does disturb me is that all season when we went top the stories would come out, now we have won the league they are going for the big one, it’s been a very well organised campaign, between Liverpool and Bayern and perhaps some United involvement

The reaction from Liverpool fans on twitter says it all, they want to salve their hurt by saying we are “cheats” and claim some sort of moral victory, and this in my opinion is what is behind this campaign

 

[BlueMoonz1977]

read this and apologises for posting if already done so


https://www.getfootballnewsfrance.com/2018/nicolas-sarkozy-and-manchester-citys-great-ffp-escape/

 

[bumbleblue]

I want us to grind these ****s into the dust on and off the pitch. C’mon City!

 

[IT and Me]

The 'relationship' between our executive and Liverpool's is on a major war footing and has been for a while.

As a club, we are aware of some of the lobbying which is being done by them to various bodies. They are constantly applying pressure and the next call is a big one.

They stole important data when some of our technical coaches left and it was traced back to them. Recently, some of our medical staff have also gone to Liverpool. They, along with Gill, have also been the ones pushing Tebas' name to replace Scudamore at the Premier League.

That's extremely disconcerting to hear. I hope we had NDAs in place with said technical staff and are in the process of pursuing litigation againt any breaches made.

 

[journolud]

Perhaps the fact that Liverpool’s second largest owners are the New York Times could have something to do with NYT’s interest in this matter or perhaps it’s just a coincidence!

Sigh

 

[half & half derby scarf]

Non story. The leaks have already been discredited and even the 'supposed' breaches have already been dealt with when we took the 'pinch'.
It is merely sour grapes, probably fuelled by Liverpool, Right wing press, Islamophobia. Take your pick!
Would love this to go to court so that UEFA could be f**ked over once and for all.

 

[The slaughtered lamb]

I am not that concerned about this latest attack, but what does disturb me is that all season when we went top the stories would come out, now we have won the league they are going for the big one, it’s been a very well organised campaign, between Liverpool and Bayern and perhaps some United involvement

The reaction from Liverpool fans on twitter says it all, they want to salve their hurt by saying we are “cheats” and claim some sort of moral victory, and this in my opinion is what is behind this campaign

I'm surprised at Liverpool fans. Maybe it's the twitterati, rather than the older ones?

Tell them they shouldn't believe everything the media puts out, then ask them to think about it, they'll probably need to.

 

[bangkokblueballs]

WE WON THE LEAGUE, WE WON THE LEAGUE, NAH NAH NAHNANNA WE WON THE LEAGUE.

They can stick their fake news propaganda up their arses. So fkin bored of it, they can try but they aint taking my joy away.

This this this this this this!!!!

 

[Oleole123]

But New York times is a newspaper and the Re not trying to ban US. It's uefa and their clubs ( barca real munich)

 

[doobyedoobye]

I am not that concerned about this latest attack, but what does disturb me is that all season when we went top the stories would come out, now we have won the league they are going for the big one, it’s been a very well organised campaign, between Liverpool and Bayern and perhaps some United involvement

The reaction from Liverpool fans on twitter says it all, they want to salve their hurt by saying we are “cheats” and claim some sort of moral victory, and this in my opinion is what is behind this campaign

I expect it will galvanize our club from top to bottom. For all the negative press that has been thrown at us over recent time the majority of other fans wanted us to win the league over them. The MSM's obvious and piteous bias will be its ultimate downfall along with all its sponsors.

 

[LevyBee76]

I hope that as the season is now more or less over, we see the gloves come off and we take them head on and go for the jugular, make them either say where the leak is from etc. or get NYT to write a retraction to clear up and show it was just BS To get the attention. either way I hopefully just want to laugh as it all comes out and everyone starts back-tracking on articles and other posts

 

[Cobwebcat]

I wonder if the report would gave come out had we not won the PL?

 

[oakiecokie]

read this and apologises for posting if already done so


https://www.getfootballnewsfrance.com/2018/nicolas-sarkozy-and-manchester-citys-great-ffp-escape/

Do we know when that article first appeared ?