Colin Bells Boots
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 15,813
- Team supported
- Manchester City
He says everything OK nothing to review .
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Var debate 2019/20
- Thread starter Chi-town blues
- Start date
He says everything OK nothing to review .
Sky sports News every Monday at 11.30am.Has Dermot had his say yet on Sky?
not repeated or available on catch up
Has Dermot had his say yet on Sky?
11:30. I will be watching and report back.
I'm sure I am just going to echo other comments, it's not working is it? We were told that it would remove controversy and deliver the correct decision. Because of the way it's been used it's more controversial than when we didn't have it and not delivering the correct decision!
Fiftyyearsandcounting
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 1,916
Even Herr Klopp agrees the shove on KDB was a penalty -
"Look at Manchester City yesterday - it was so clear and obvious that Kevin de Bruyne was pushed [against Crystal Palace] and if I am saying Manchester City should have had a penalty then it must have been a penalty."
From BBC SPorts Website https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/50119117
"Look at Manchester City yesterday - it was so clear and obvious that Kevin de Bruyne was pushed [against Crystal Palace] and if I am saying Manchester City should have had a penalty then it must have been a penalty."
From BBC SPorts Website https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/50119117
brummie blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 9,007
The premise of VAR is good, other than the frame rate not being up to much the technology works.
Unfortunately, there are a bunch of muppets running it and ultimately making the decisions, who are just the poor referees we have stuck in front of a screen, their incompetence, bias or down right stubbornness to stick together and not show each other up makes VAR pointless. It won't change because the premier league and FA have supported it in its current guise and the back the ref's endlessly.
The only thing you can really trust is goal line technology as it doesn't need intervention from any idiots.
Dermot on Sky this morning, doesn't think the ball hits Dele Ali's arm prior to the Spurs goal, two professional footballers in the studio say it hits the arm, this sum's up the problem, but he does think Zaha's foul on KDB is a penalty.
No body has the balls to say, ref you've missed that one, reverse your decision.
Unfortunately, there are a bunch of muppets running it and ultimately making the decisions, who are just the poor referees we have stuck in front of a screen, their incompetence, bias or down right stubbornness to stick together and not show each other up makes VAR pointless. It won't change because the premier league and FA have supported it in its current guise and the back the ref's endlessly.
The only thing you can really trust is goal line technology as it doesn't need intervention from any idiots.
Dermot on Sky this morning, doesn't think the ball hits Dele Ali's arm prior to the Spurs goal, two professional footballers in the studio say it hits the arm, this sum's up the problem, but he does think Zaha's foul on KDB is a penalty.
No body has the balls to say, ref you've missed that one, reverse your decision.
Last edited:
Everyones moaning about the time taken for the ref to go to the monitor...Use the 4th official, he can make judgement calls, we can all see who it is making the decisions, just let the 4th official take a quick squint at the replay and make a call.
In rugby the ref, VAR Ref, and other officials all make an agreed and concise agreement. I dont think i have seen a ref on the pitch look at the monitor once yet himself and leaves it up the man in the van...
Gorton_Tubster
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 14,809
- Location
- Riding the blue tidal wave.
- Team supported
- Manchester City
"I even admit City should have had a penalty therefore I am speaking the truth"Even Herr Klopp agrees the shove on KDB was a penalty -
"Look at Manchester City yesterday - it was so clear and obvious that Kevin de Bruyne was pushed [against Crystal Palace] and if I am saying Manchester City should have had a penalty then it must have been a penalty."
From BBC SPorts Website https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/50119117
He says everything OK nothing to review .
Nope, he said United goal should have been disallowed which is correct. Mane goal should have been disallowed, which it was and is correct. Watford one should have been a pen and was incorrect!!
kippaxwarrior
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 21,874
- Location
- Jupiter Mining Corporation Red Dwarf
- Team supported
- City of course!!
What about the Zaha push on Kev?Nope, he said United goal should have been disallowed which is correct. Mane goal should have been disallowed, which it was and is correct. Watford one should have been a pen and was incorrect!!
tommo74
Well-Known Member
And if my aunty had a dick she would be my uncle, and how do you know the game would have panned out differently? Oh you don'tNo because the whole game is changed at every decision. IF VAR had not intervened in the Liverpool equaliser the whole game would have panned out differently. So perhaps you are the one who should keep in your Bluemoon gang of argumentative disbelievers.