Nascent Blues
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 5,241
Does anyone know if this will impact on the PUMA deal?
To be honest we were always going to say we expected it and will deal with it, but whether we are successful or not is a very different matter indeedThis was dealt with in Khaldoon's end of (2019) season video. They have been expecting it and are ready to deal with it.
It has probably been frustrating for them to have to wait for the UEFA process to finish before they can get started.
We probably have evidence that we are not willing to disclose/share with UEFA (personal emails etc), that would blow their case out of the water.
CAS will have ALL of our defence evidence.
I just hope City are keeping tabs on any libelous headlines coming out of the press. This compensation money could fund us for years!
IF it is proven we did cook the books, then fair enough we deserve what we get. I will still support City exactly the same way.
However, if proven UEFA had no grounds for a case, then they should have the book thrown at them for damaging our brand.
No. Turn up and walk out at half time.Mad to think that I wasn’t expecting this. I actually can’t believe they’ve banned us. Their intention is to destroy us a football club.
Fuck going to the Madrid game.
I'm wondering whether CAS has given UEFA the heads up saying the leaking of information is not the right thing to do and you will get a slap on the wrist
Giving them the green light to do what they have done tonight
Not sure about your user name but bang on the money all the same
Is Lincoln all ticket or pay at the gateHas anyone got the map to York?
Is it bollocks true, and we have UEFA to thank for confirming that. They agreed when they moved the goalposts that the Etihad deal was at market value and didn't dispute it. They asked us not to raise a couple of lower tier sponsorships at the time for 2 years (Aarabar was one I think).How can a sponsorship be overinflated? Their argument is based that due to Abu Dhabi ties to both Etihad and City it must mean that the deal was inflated so City adheres the FFP. It is probably true but how can this be objectively proven? Simple answer is it can not be.
What’s the name of the guy who hacked our records