Absolute bollocks, PSG have paid most of UEFA off & you know that, a to bit league with a club paying 100's of millions in wages not a chance they get round FFP
Your owner & his company have bribed the fucking world, the World Cup is just tip of the ice berg his PSG dealings are a joke
It will all come out you just wait bent as fuck 100%
You see, it works both ways.Absolute bollocks, PSG have paid most of UEFA off & you know that, a to bit league with a club paying 100's of millions in wages not a chance they get round FFP
Your owner & his company have bribed the fucking world, the World Cup is just tip of the ice berg his PSG dealings are a joke
It will all come out you just wait bent as fuck 100%
Maybe but 7m sounds nonsense to me. The whole FFP procedure and rules are flawed and the fact they got cleared and we didn't the blame should be directed at UEFA not PSG.. Thats what fans of other clubs do to us through their ignorance, we shouldn’t stoop to that.
And by proving that the process was flawed or corrupt the target will be those who have corrupted the process, for the bent officials not to get caught in the crossfire they have to acquiesce to our assertion that we have been targeted by a self protectionist cabal of rogues.
It amounts to the same thing bud.
Conn must think his readers are idiots.
He says it is interesting that Soriano says,
“The owner [Sheikh Mansour of Abu Dhabi] has not put any money in this club that has not been properly declared” ... when "Internal City emails published by Der Spiegel in November 2018, which prompted the CFCB investigation, did suggest that Mansour substantially paid the £67.5m sponsorship stated to be from the Abu Dhabi airline Etihad" when a couple of days ago he wrote that the UAE state covered the Etihad sponsorship.
Whatever City do or say will be criticised in some quarters.
Not sure what Frankfurt’s beef with UEFA is, but I like the sentiment:
City will nver let us do that
I appreciate you meant to make a point about double standards being used to assess the same reporter’s articles about City and PSG, but just be careful you don’t fall in to the WUM pit whilst doing it.If you think what Panja writes for PSG is legit, you should think what is right about City is legit too. He got the very same source.
This is precisely the problem City are facing. Some journalist puts out some unsubstantiated nonsense about us, and fans of every other club immediately treat it as fact, and we are demonised.How is it a fact exactly ?
In Panja article and after several requests, he is unable to give a number to the alleged figure Leterme has decided to go with.
Given QTA has been decreased to 58 M from 100 M, i wonder how an independent analysis can conclude the sponsorship deal was overvalued by 93 M. Should PSG be the one paying their sponsor ?
I know it can be difficult to tolerate the views of supporters of other clubs on here but you can make your point without trying to kick things off with every word.Absolute bollocks, PSG have paid most of UEFA off & you know that, a to bit league with a club paying 100's of millions in wages not a chance they get round FFP
Your owner & his company have bribed the fucking world, the World Cup is just tip of the ice berg his PSG dealings are a joke
It will all come out you just wait bent as fuck 100%
You see, it works both ways.
If you think what Panja writes for PSG is legit, you should think what is right about City is legit too. He got the very same source.
So in summary, lay off the gear.I appreciate you meant to make a point about double standards being used to assess the same reporter’s articles about City and PSG, but just be careful you don’t fall in to the WUM pit whilst doing it.
Blues on here may sometimes be less than accommodating of more nuanced opinions from supporters of other clubs, and may go a bit too far in expressing their objections at times, but this is a City forum, so you should know that will be the potential treatment when coming on here, the same as for a City supporter going on to a PSG fan forum.
We’ll tidy things up if responses are OTT but you should also be careful not to intentionally instigate them with inflammatory posts like the above, as well.
Thanks in advance for your consideration.
I appreciate you meant to make a point about double standards being used to assess the same reporter’s articles about City and PSG, but just be careful you don’t fall in to the WUM pit whilst doing it.
Blues on here may sometimes be less than accommodating of more nuanced opinions from supporters of other clubs, and may go a bit too far in expressing their objections at times, but this is a City forum, so you should know that will be the potential treatment when coming on here, the same as for a City supporter going on to a PSG fan forum.
We’ll tidy things up if responses are OTT but you should also be careful not to intentionally instigate them with inflammatory posts like the above, as well.
Thanks in advance for your consideration.
You see, it works both ways.
If you think what Panja writes for PSG is legit, you should think what is right about City is legit too. He got the very same source.
Hence the difference between making an argument and trying to kick things off, as I have outlined above.You're right, but then again so is he, everyone is allowed to voice their opinions, it should spark debate though , not telling fellow blues to 'sling it' as ive seen haha.
I won’t comment on what may be contributing to the behaviour. ;-)So in summary, lay off the gear.
FIFA rather than UEFA?I’m really not sure there’s much evidence of PSG bribing UEFA but I certainly think some figures at UEFA may have taken bribes as part of the Qatar World Cup bid - which like all other recent processes was fraught with corruption. I think PSG are probably aware of who at UEFA is compromised and may be taking advantage of the fact. That would certainly explain the recent process where a few leading figures quickly selected reverse gear. All conjecture though.
City will nver let us do that