Coronavirus: Football Discussion Thread

Didsbury Dave said:
If it happened to us this entre forum would blame it on the world's anti-City conspiracy. "It would never happen if it was Liverpool!!!!" would be the most typed phrase on the whole forum.
Click to expand...

Mibby. i did day many, and bulk. I do think this decesion took longer than it should have to make, and it has not yet fully been made. And liverpool happen to be in that position. So, it might vet said yet!
 
It's not hard is it just fucking terminate the football season for the rest of the season, it's not a big deal it's only a fucking game
 
Didsbury Dave said:
If it happened to us this entre forum would blame it on the world's anti-City conspiracy. "It would never happen if it was Liverpool!!!!" would be the most typed phrase on the whole forum.
Click to expand...
No joke I'd be a mard arse if it was City, that's what makes it so funny though - is that it's not City, it's Livarpool who have a bunch of wierdo cultists attached to the club.
 
BlueAnorak said:
I asked my daughter's best friend who is a public health statistician and apparantly the reasoning for the government not cancelling sports stadium events is as follows.
If you attend a professional sport event you connect with on average 14 people. 6 people who you brush past en route to/from the game. The two people you sit next to, 3 people behind you and 3 people in front of you and the 3 people behind you can only be infectious to you. You are outside for the most part, so less infectious than indoors.
In comparison standing outside like the fans of PSG did is lethal. Watching sport in a pub is even worse as you are in an enclosed atmosphere with 25+ people.
No, the only reason for cancelling sport is if the players can spread it to each other or the use of umpteen police and emergency personal staff who can be better employed elsewhere.
Click to expand...
Well if you cancel sport then there is no reason for anyone to gather anywhere to watch it.
Your argument works when put against playing BCD but not if you cancel the event.
Plus its's not just the 6 people you are in contact with en route to a game. The surfaces in public transport can have the virus survive on it for up to 2 days.
It's the movement of masses of people that is spreading this. Cut that down and you cut down the spread.
 
BlueAnorak said:
I asked my daughter's best friend who is a public health statistician and apparantly the reasoning for the government not cancelling sports stadium events is as follows.
If you attend a professional sport event you connect with on average 14 people. 6 people who you brush past en route to/from the game. The two people you sit next to, 3 people behind you and 3 people in front of you and the 3 people behind you can only be infectious to you. You are outside for the most part, so less infectious than indoors.
In comparison standing outside like the fans of PSG did is lethal. Watching sport in a pub is even worse as you are in an enclosed atmosphere with 25+ people.
No, the only reason for cancelling sport is if the players can spread it to each other or the use of umpteen police and emergency personal staff who can be better employed elsewhere.
Click to expand...
I brushed through 10 times that amount of people in the pub alone,it was literally packed ,getting to the bar pushed up to everyone face to face then back through to get out into the garden,add to that everyone on 2 train journeys and at the game,the taxis etc,also it is spread through touching surfaces as well,it only takes one door handle to infect you

Honestly does the government think we are fucking stupid !!!
 
Brightwells left peg said:
I'm absolutely gutted this season will likely get cancelled/null and voided.

A few weeks back I was asked to invest in a Merseyside candle making outfit, but they were looking like they were about to go under due to the positive mood, so I turned it down and held out for a better opportunity.

Its like being handed the winning Lottery Jackpot numbers in advance, but deciding to save up for a trip to the Bingo instead.
Click to expand...


Naaasty!

Tasty…
 
BlueAnorak said:
I asked my daughter's best friend who is a public health statistician and apparantly the reasoning for the government not cancelling sports stadium events is as follows.
If you attend a professional sport event you connect with on average 14 people. 6 people who you brush past en route to/from the game. The two people you sit next to, 3 people behind you and 3 people in front of you and the 3 people behind you can only be infectious to you. You are outside for the most part, so less infectious than indoors.
In comparison standing outside like the fans of PSG did is lethal. Watching sport in a pub is even worse as you are in an enclosed atmosphere with 25+ people.
No, the only reason for cancelling sport is if the players can spread it to each other or the use of umpteen police and emergency personal staff who can be better employed elsewhere.
Click to expand...

So the travelling on a tram/bus/train crammed in like sardines doesn’t add to the 14? The coughs etc on those modes of public transport could add up to a lot more than 14.

What is different about standing outside the venue to standing inside the venue? I admit I didn’t see how the PSG people mingled but why would it be different from mingling (if that is what it could be called) on a tram/train or bus?
Please note I am not being argumentative just curious as to how they come to that conclusion. :-)
 
karen7 said:
We could have won the fa and the cl but we are not whinging about it
Click to expand...

In the name of scrupulous fairness — although they don't really deserve it, not from us anyway — they're nearly a certainty to be champions. We're definitely not nearly a certainty to be F.A. Cup or CL winners.
However, the principle that I outlined above p.239 #2386 holds good.
 
I’m sure all the stops will be pulled out to ensure that the league season is completed somehow so that winners, relegation and promotion are all sorted.
 
Jesus2018 said:
I keep thinking if Liverpool have won the Premier league fair and square then we can't be bitter about it.
Can't cheat them out of a title after winning the most games. Getting the most points.

What's the point in a competition if you can just take away the prize because you're not happy about the winner? Might as well just not bother at all.

Then I remember they've played every game with an extra ref and their own personal VAR team when we've been fucked over by both and I think fuck em, fuck their cheating title and fuck their first league win in 30yrs. And fuck their unbearable fans too.
Click to expand...
But it affects us as much as it does them.

Cancelling the season will cancel the best chance we’ve ever had of lifting the European Cup for the first time.

But the season needs cancelling. Just void the end of the season, City and Liverpool have both won two trophies each (City - Community Shield and EFL Cup; Liverpool - UEFA Super Cup and FIFA World Club Cup), but will be as gutted as each other about missing out on the prize both clubs wanted most respectively this season.

Or void the entire season and start again next season.
 
If they do declare the season null and void, how would they allocate the television merit money?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top