UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

[franksinatra]

For part 3, we compiled a report at their request, so they have evidence but declined to use it.
For part 2, authorities showed zero interest as no complaint was made to police or information commissioner.

Part 2. Besides the parties involved most people would prefer tax payers money was not wasted on investigating an offence 5 years ago to solve a spat between two corporate giants, so no issue with that.

Part 3. We messed up royally there. I have no idea why City accepted the payment and now the ‘aggrieved party’ is complicit with initially withholding information from the Premier League. It was as poor a decision as not preventing the IT breach in the first place.

 

[Lovebitesandeveryfing]

A similar question was asked the other day and I found the answer funny. It was along the lines, not as quick as UEFA who delivered the verdict before the hearing.

That reminds me of a joke I heard the other day. Some kids dream of growing up and becoming President. Trump is the only recorded instance of someone becoming a President before growing up.

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

How long after an hearing do CAS normally deliver a verdict?

As long as it takes David Gill to get hold of Tariq Panja.

 

[KS55]

I like Trump.


His cue power is awesome.

 

[BringBackSwales]

I like Trump.


His cue power is awesome.

Well he is a right fucking wanker. Oh you mean the snooker player?

 

[iwasthere1968]

Wasn't the PL because it was a while ago (I may have misquoted that earlier)?
The FA said that no-one would give them any info, so City partly blocked that.

As City accepted a payoff, presumably they'd be reticent about offering any support to any criminal enquiry.

I like to think that by taking Scousers to court re the hacking we would risk revealing all we know and how we know it.
So this battle was best avoided.

 

[crazyg]

Well he is a right fucking wanker. Oh you mean the snooker player?

And he's a red bastard.

 

[LucahArchie10]

As long as it takes David Gill to get hold of Tariq Panja.

Can anyone tell me why we haven't called Gill out?

Surely we have shit on this fucking clown??

When we win this at CAS will we take this clown down PB?

I would love to see handcuffs on the c...!!!

 

[robbie brewer]

You sir, have far to much time on your hands, twice I’ve read that, and it’s still makes no sense whatsoever, lol

A lot of work there, well done.

If we signed the settlement agreement on 16/05/2014 then surely the 5 years expires on 15/05/2019. We were charged on 16/05/2019 1 day too late

 

[LucahArchie10]

Part 2. Besides the parties involved most people would prefer tax payers money was not wasted on investigating an offence 5 years ago to solve a spat between two corporate giants, so no issue with that.

Part 3. We messed up royally there. I have no idea why City accepted the payment and now the ‘aggrieved party’ is complicit with initially withholding information from the Premier League. It was as poor a decision as not preventing the IT breach in the first place.

It doesnt add up for me, either they have something on us or we have done a deal on something or someone??

If that's the other way round I see Liverpool sending us to the dogs.

Is it me or have we just rolled over & let Liverpool tickle our belly??