TheRemainsOfTheDave
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Mar 2017
- Messages
- 6,491
Just did the same when I read that. Grim.Yikes. Sends shivers down my spine.
Just did the same when I read that. Grim.Yikes. Sends shivers down my spine.
Not painted black, blue has worn off. Expand and look.He's painted it black and devalued it, Still a nice piece to own though.
Don't think they'd take an e-bike, e-scooter or segway, at the Etihad.
Yes. I go for a couple of walks every day in and about town, and I smile every time I see an e-scooter. It looks fun. E-bikes still very expensive but I can see them becoming really popular. I believe the speed is capped at 15 mph. If they could just do a little bit more then they could be used for longer journeys. That is what I need. I don't want to get the train every day so I am looking for solutions. An e-bike is really close. It could be really liberating for a lot of people and enable them to enjoy the countryside without having to be super-fit to get up those hills.I don't think e-bikes need any special type of storage area and there are already plenty of bike racks around the stadium that don't seem to see much usage on matchdays ?
In years to come I could see myself zipping on an ebike to Chester station, then travelling on an electrified railway to Victoria or Piccadilly (if the 80% aspiration Network Rail announced the other day comes to pass) then zipping to the stadium and parking up.
The journey home in the dark might not be as attractive in winter though so I may need to do more research...
Assistance is capped, not speedYes. I go for a couple of walks every day in and about town, and I smile every time I see an e-scooter. It looks fun. E-bikes still very expensive but I can see them becoming really popular. I believe the speed is capped at 15 mph. If they could just do a little bit more then they could be used for longer journeys. That is what I need. I don't want to get the train every day so I am looking for solutions. An e-bike is really close. It could be really liberating for a lot of people and enable them to enjoy the countryside without having to be super-fit to get up those hills.
Not painted black, blue has worn off. Expand and look.
This thread needs to get back to the topic of a much-needed single-tier North Stand and a smaller family stand.
I hope somebody is constantly whispering in the club's ear that a single tier with safe standing and cheaper tickets will transform the match day experience.This thread needs to get back to the topic of a much-needed single-tier North Stand and a smaller family stand.
Absolutely. Or better still they are getting that message from several sources. It's not a panacea to cure all the hills of the current "match day experience" but it would go a long way.I hope somebody is constantly whispering in the club's ear that a single tier with safe standing and cheaper tickets will transform the match day experience.
Don’t see how it can happen without closing the stand so it won’t happen. Besides don’t think it improves the experience any more than a 2 tier option with safe standing would.I hope somebody is constantly whispering in the club's ear that a single tier with safe standing and cheaper tickets will transform the match day experience.
If next weeks decision does not go our way, I can't see the expansion happening anytime soon, it will set the club back years.I hope somebody is constantly whispering in the club's ear that a single tier with safe standing and cheaper tickets will transform the match day experience.
I sit close to the family stand and their seems to be an awful lot of adults in there. The rate must be something close to 4/5 adults to one child. I have seen sometimes when they are queuing to go in that there are an awful lot of grown ups going in but no children.
Why can't they move the family stand down to the bottom tier and leave the top tier open to adults.
I sit close to the family stand and their seems to be an awful lot of adults in there. The rate must be something close to 4/5 adults to one child. I have seen sometimes when they are queuing to go in that there are an awful lot of grown ups going in but no children.
Why can't they move the family stand down to the bottom tier and leave the top tier open to adults.
I recall reading years ago how developments connected with a football club stadium could be counted as revenue. Hence the likes of Chelsea village and hotel although it probably was conceived to cover the likes of concessions directly outside the ground.
Anyone know if this still applies? If so what elements around the Etihad would count? Clearly this could impact on matchday revenue and FFP.
I sit close to the family stand and their seems to be an awful lot of adults in there. The rate must be something close to 4/5 adults to one child. I have seen sometimes when they are queuing to go in that there are an awful lot of grown ups going in but no children.
Why can't they move the family stand down to the bottom tier and leave the top tier open to adults.
The bottom tier is a family stand also. But you are right there are a lot of adults. We sit in there.I sit close to the family stand and their seems to be an awful lot of adults in there. The rate must be something close to 4/5 adults to one child. I have seen sometimes when they are queuing to go in that there are an awful lot of grown ups going in but no children.
Why can't they move the family stand down to the bottom tier and leave the top tier open to adults.