Your problem is you think anything but unfettered propaganda for the club is anti-city.
Opening an article which is about how Pep went off tangent from a normal question to have a massive go at Arsenal by pointing out how Pep has a habit of going off on tangents is not an attack on City.
Wouldnt let me save the image but its in this link by martin Samuel
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/f...-plot-ruin-Premier-League--Martin-Samuel.html
Cheers mate that's the one
Your problem is that you think you’re the guard dog of any City related discussion and discourse. You believe your opinion is the only one that matters and that any other is wrong. Even people running the club aren’t safe from this approach.
If I think the Athletic often portray Pep in a negative light, rarely highlighting his achievements, then that’s my right. It’s hardly a controversial subject.
I have no issue with you voicing your opinion, but do when you make up lies like "not at all from City's POV" - which is an objective lie. The article is literally written from Citys perspective airing all of their grievances with Arsenal in chronological order.
If you don't want people to correct you when you lie, dont lie, it's not hard
are you mad, dommy is no guard dog, he is an attack dog and once he sinks his teeth in he doesn't let goYour problem is that you think you’re the guard dog of any City related discussion and discourse. You believe your opinion is the only one that matters and that any other is wrong. Even people running the club aren’t safe from this approach.
If I think the Athletic often portray Pep in a negative light, rarely highlighting his achievements, then that’s my right. It’s hardly a controversial subject.
You mean the media were actually questioning him about next game? Only seems to happen after a defeat, strange that.I can’t say but here’s a section. Gotta love the derogatory tone.
———
As is so often the case, an idea popped into Pep Guardiola’s head and he couldn’t resist saying it. He had been discussing the prospect of facing Watford and Norwich as preparation for Real Madrid when he went off on a tangent to get something off his chest.
It is the kind of comment that will attract plenty of headlines because it is, quite literally and very unapologetically, a lack of respect for another Premier League club.
Guardiola’s tendency to speak his mind has regularly been a problem for Manchester City’s communications department
———
Exactly mate.I find it hard to comprehend how any City fan could find Pep at fault for calling out the upper hierarchy of Arsenal. They deserve it 100% and I'm glad we're shining a light on them, they've hidden in the shadows for far too long. Lets get them some negative press for a change.
You mean the media were actually questioning him about next game? Only seems to happen after a defeat, strange that.
"Did you take a bung Pep?" Would suggest either you're wrong or we're very very shit at it.City control what questions are asked at a press conference.
I am what I am.Unfortunately there’s someone on here posting a lot who is the biggest know it all I’ve seen.
"Did you take a bung Pep?" Would suggest either you're wrong or we're very very shit at it.
I still look at the lad in black (bottom right) who`s telling people to fuck off. Then holds his open palms up because he shits himself.
My thoughts entirelyWhy are Arsenal fans moaning about Pep’s comments? He said he has no issue with the manager or the players - just the people who run the club. Most Arsenal fans can’t stand their owner either so they should be on Pep’s side for fuck’s sake!
You mean the love child of Peter Kay and David Cameron?Pink polo shirt bottom left who is suddenly dragged away by an invisible hook. Josh Widdecombe and Micky Flanagan. Priceless.
The media will make a meal of it, conveniently forgetting how they defended the guttersnipe who questioned Pep where his salary came from straight after the cup final.You mean the media were actually questioning him about next game? Only seems to happen after a defeat, strange that.