You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Harry Kane
- Thread starter Super Joey Hart
- Start date
Wrong kevs our biggest earner Silva around the same Kane’s on around 220k so if we get him I don’t think we will he be on around Silva’s money so no difference to our yearly wages structure.
He will still want more money if he were to join especially if it was at a record transfer fee.
T
T
Tony - MCFC
Guest
Same as Chilwell, can’t see anywhere we’ve actually been linked with Kane at all.
LongsightM13
Well-Known Member
Same two randomsSame as Chilwell, can’t see anywhere we’ve actually been linked with Kane at all.
simon23
Well-Known Member
lmao so how do we score 100 goals a season against these 10 defenders
We do cause we have strikers/attackers that work in small spaces - my point is that Kane doesnt have to do that at Spurs as teams dont defend against spurs the way they defend against us. Kane wouldnt get the space he gets playing for us that he gets afforde playing for Spurs.
Nor does Kane have the mobility/athelticism to play in a high pressing team. He also doesnt have the ability to play across the front line where as all ut players to some extent (but especially Sterling and GJ) do have that ability
Paying for Kane now means that we then have a striker who is injury prone, does not fit our system and probably on high wages - if he doesnt work out we would struggle to move him on and it would be at a huge loss - this would then block us from going out and attracting any younger strikers that come through in the next season or two (e.g Haaland) that we could get that would be longer term solutions to replacing Aguero
For me, this is a really poor choice by the club (If its true)
simon23
Well-Known Member
Same two randoms
to be fair 93:20 aint a random - he has got previous postive credibility in terms of inside info
Im not sure who else has said Kane
He will still want more money if he were to join especially if it was at a record transfer fee.
How much more than Kdb? He be happy with 300k max but he ain’t coming we ain’t paying 150m for anyone.
Ashleymcduff
Well-Known Member
We do cause we have strikers/attackers that work in small spaces - my point is that Kane doesnt have to do that at Spurs as teams dont defend against spurs the way they defend against us. Kane wouldnt get the space he gets playing for us that he gets afforde playing for Spurs.
Nor does Kane have the mobility/athelticism to play in a high pressing team. He also doesnt have the ability to play across the front line where as all ut players to some extent (but especially Sterling and GJ) do have that ability
Paying for Kane now means that we then have a striker who is injury prone, does not fit our system and probably on high wages - if he doesnt work out we would struggle to move him on and it would be at a huge loss - this would then block us from going out and attracting any younger strikers that come through in the next season or two (e.g Haaland) that we could get that would be longer term solutions to replacing Aguero
For me, this is a really poor choice by the club (If its true)
haaland won’t sign for us . I’d bet my house on it.
the games where we’ve struggled and end up pumping endless cross after cross in to the box and the countless chances we miss , Kane would only need one or two , not like Jesus who needs 3 or 4.
yes he doesn’t suit are system by not playing across the front 3 but neither does Aguero , no difference to me between the 2 when
Finishing comes to it yes Kuns low centre of gravity and close control is better but they are both goal machines.
Last edited:
simon23
Well-Known Member
haaland won’t sign for us . I’d bet my house on it.
the games where we’ve struggled and end up pumping endless cross after cross in to the box and the countless chances we miss , Jane would only need one or two , not like Jesus who needs 3 or 4.
yes he doesn’t suit are system by not playing across the front 3 but neither does Aguero , no difference to me between the 2 when
Finishing comes to it yes Kuns low centre of gravity and close control is better but they are both goal machines.
I agree on Haaland - I was just using him as an example.
Aguero has adapted so well to being able to play across the front 3 - better than Kane ever will.
Kane wouldnt be effective int he chaneswe get again cause of his lack of mobility and ability to work in small spaces - he is not the type of striker we need at all and age wise (and injury histroy) is also a concern.
How much more than Kdb? He be happy with 300k max but he ain’t coming we ain’t paying 150m for anyone.
£350,000-400,000 p/w would be my guess which is too much