BluessinceHydeRoad
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Mar 2012
- Messages
- 2,562
I'm sure we won't have to wait long for the result of the ethics committee investigation. Liverpool especially would never stoop so low as to refuse cooperation.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)
- Thread starter jimharri
- Start date
I'm sure we won't have to wait long for the result of the ethics committee investigation. Liverpool especially would never stoop so low as to refuse cooperation.
I'm sure we won't have to wait long for the result of the ethics committee investigation. Liverpool especially would never stoop so low as to refuse cooperation.
Not only that but David Gill and everyone at Manchester United Football Club will also want a speedy resolution. "For the good of the game," don't you know...
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
Is this report something to be genuinely released, and what is it looking at? Haven't followed the thread that much since the resultThe result of the ethics committee investigation is when we'll find out if Ceferin has any bollocks and if we do have allies in UEFA
dickie davies
Well-Known Member
City complained to UEFA about the press leaks coming from within UEFA during our investigation. They're listed in the November CAS judgement documentIs this report something to be genuinely released, and what is it looking at? Haven't followed the thread that much since the result
https://www.tas-cas.org/en/jurisprudence/recent-decisions.html
The complaint was referred to UEFA'S ethics committee for investigation
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
Thanks for the info. Will be interesting to see what they have to sayCity complained to UEFA about the press leaks coming from within UEFA during our investigation. They're listed in the CAS judgement document
The complaint was referred to UEFA'S ethics committee for investigation
dickie davies
Well-Known Member
I've added a link to the Cas websiteThanks for the info. Will be interesting to see what they have to say
It's the 2019 judgement doc
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
Where?I've added a link to the Cas website
It's the 2019 judgement doc
Keith Moon
Well-Known Member
Makes sense to me. The bottom line is City were exonerted from the UEFA charges and a two year ban from European competitions was lifted.
I am not sure why some people here appear obsessed with not just how decisions were reached but by whom. We are not privy to such information as is not published so can only speculate. Judges are objective by definition and questioning the process and impartiality can only undermine the outcome - which found in Citys favour. That is good enough for me even though others may disagree.
I checked with CAS, it was 2-1.
dickie davies
Well-Known Member
City complained to UEFA about the press leaks coming from within UEFA during our investigation. They're listed in the November CAS judgement document
https://www.tas-cas.org/en/jurisprudence/recent-decisions.html
The complaint was referred to UEFA'S ethics committee for investigation
Where?
In my post I've quoted above
jimmygrimblesboots
Well-Known Member
ive been banned from the media thread for the last 12 months , so i will put this here as its relevant , Rob Harris is now questioning why we were allowed to choose two of the three judges/panel who came to the CAS decision ,Harris really is obsessed with our club , when football does return he will need a big pair of bollocks to turn up at the Etihad.
Mike Cledford
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Jun 2019
- Messages
- 5,248
- Team supported
- Man City
Do people like Harris actually go to matches or are they long distance snipers watching in a studio or even at home?ive been banned from the media thread for the last 12 months , so i will put this here as its relevant , Rob Harris is now questioning why we were allowed to choose two of the three judges/panel who came to the CAS decision ,Harris really is obsessed with our club , when football does return he will need a big pair of bollocks to turn up at the Etihad.
BlueAnorak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 30,106
He's a dick who is a fecking idiot. The arbiters are independent of both parties and are selected from a list.ive been banned from the media thread for the last 12 months , so i will put this here as its relevant , Rob Harris is now questioning why we were allowed to choose two of the three judges/panel who came to the CAS decision ,Harris really is obsessed with our club , when football does return he will need a big pair of bollocks to turn up at the Etihad.
UEFA chose one from a panel of independent arbiters. We chose likewise. And CAS themselves chose the president of the panel.
from CAS Rules and Regs:
R33 Independence and Qualifications of Arbitrators
Every arbitrator shall be and remain impartial and independent of the parties and shall immediately disclose any circumstances which may affect her/his independence with respect to any of the parties.
Every arbitrator shall appear on the list drawn up by the ICAS in accordance with the Statutes which are part of this Code, shall have a good command of the language of the arbitration and shall be available as required to complete the arbitration
expeditiously.
...
R54 (relevant paragraph)
If three arbitrators are to be appointed, the President of the Division shall appoint the President of the Panel following nomination of the arbitrator by the Respondent and after having consulted the arbitrators. The arbitrators nominated by the parties shall only be deemed appointed after confirmation by the President of the Division. Before proceeding with such confirmation, the President of the Division shall ensure that the arbitrators comply with the requirements of Article R33.
Last edited:
Bill
Well-Known Member
why wouldn't he? he is warmly welcomed and treated to the finest hospitality .Do people like Harris actually go to matches or are they long distance snipers watching in a studio or even at home?
we are fucking idiots.
BluessinceHydeRoad
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Mar 2012
- Messages
- 2,562
City complained to UEFA about the press leaks coming from within UEFA during our investigation. They're listed in the November CAS judgement document
https://www.tas-cas.org/en/jurisprudence/recent-decisions.html
The complaint was referred to UEFA'S ethics committee for investigation
I'm glad it was referred to UEFA's ethics committee. They're the only body who can investigate because UEFA and the IC are completely independent of each other and all the members of the IC are free from any taint of any conflict of interest. We're guaranteed a speedy and objective report.
kaz7
Well-Known Member
Do we know when that investigation finishes?The result of the ethics committee investigation is when we'll find out if Ceferin has any bollocks and if we do have allies in UEFA
bluemanchester
Well-Known Member
I thought I read on here thst we chose one UEFA chose one and as we were the defendant we chose the president from a CAS list and UEFA had to agree with that choice, as they did, otherwise CAS would appoint a president if City and UEFA could not agree on the president City chose. I could be wrong.He's a dick who is a fecking idiot. The arbiters are independent of both parties and are selected from a list.
UEFA chose one from a panel of independent arbiters. We chose likewise. And CAS themselves chose the president of the panel.
from CAS Rules and Regs:
bluemanchester
Well-Known Member
That depends on who is guilty of the leaks. If it is influential clubs from the ECA it will be buried.Do we know when that investigation finishes?
dickie davies
Well-Known Member
All we know is that it is "ongoing "Do we know when that investigation finishes?
Let's hope it's not a Merseyside Police style of "ongoing "
kaz7
Well-Known Member
We have to keep reminding themThat depends on who is guilty of the leaks. If it is influential clubs from the ECA it will be buried.